Goldman Ran D, Macpherson Alison, Schuh Suzanne, Mulligan Crystal, Pirie Jonathan
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave,. Toronto ON M5G 1X8.
CMAJ. 2005 Jan 4;172(1):39-43. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031817.
Children who visit pediatric emergency departments (EDs) and leave before being seen by a physician may present with particular health problems and may be at risk for preventable health outcomes. We compared children who left without being seen with those who stayed and were seen by a pediatrician, and followed all of the study subjects after they left the ED.
We asked all parents of children who visited the ED between July 1 and Oct. 31, 2002, to participate. Parents were interviewed by a trained ED research assistant. We abstracted data from the ED medical records. We used the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to measure the acuity of the illness or injury. Each child who left without being seen was matched with 2 children who had been seen by selecting the next patients on an alphabetical list by day, sex and age (within 1 year). We did follow-up interviews with parents within 96 hours of the visit to determine the reason for leaving and any treatment and diagnoses received subsequent to the ED visit.
Of the 11 087 children seen in the ED during the study period, 289 (3%) left without being seen. Of the 289, the families of 158 (56%) consented to participate in the study and met the study criteria. The case and control groups thus consisted of 158 and 316 children respectively. Of the children who left without being seen, 24 (15%) were triaged as "urgent," and none had a CTAS score of less than 3. A total of 99 children (63%) who left were taken by their families elsewhere for further medical care, compared with 89 (28%) of those who stayed. Waiting too long and resolution of symptoms accounted for 92 (58%) and 59 (37%) of the premature departures respectively. One child who left without being seen was subsequently admitted to hospital. Multivariate analysis showed that, after adjustment for time of arrival and time to reach the ED, children who left without being seen had lower acuity than those who stayed (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-7.2) and were more likely to register in the ED between midnight and 4 am (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.8- 12.5). Children in the premature departure group were also more likely to be taken elsewhere for follow-up care (unadjusted OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.9-6.4).
Children who left the ED without being seen had lower acuity levels and were more likely to be taken elsewhere for follow-up care than children who stayed. Most of those who left did so because the wait was too long or their symptoms resolved.
前往儿科急诊科就诊但在见到医生之前就离开的儿童可能存在特殊的健康问题,并且可能面临可预防的健康后果风险。我们比较了未就诊就离开的儿童与留下来并由儿科医生诊治的儿童,并在他们离开急诊科后对所有研究对象进行了随访。
我们邀请了2002年7月1日至10月31日期间前往急诊科就诊的所有儿童的家长参与。由一名经过培训的急诊科研究助理对家长进行访谈。我们从急诊科病历中提取数据。我们使用加拿大急诊科分诊和 acuity 量表(CTAS)来衡量疾病或损伤的严重程度。通过按日期、性别和年龄(在1岁以内)在字母顺序列表中选择接下来的患者,将每一名未就诊就离开的儿童与2名已就诊的儿童进行匹配。我们在就诊后96小时内对家长进行随访访谈,以确定离开的原因以及急诊科就诊后接受的任何治疗和诊断。
在研究期间在急诊科就诊的11087名儿童中,289名(3%)未就诊就离开。在这289名儿童中,158名(56%)的家庭同意参与研究并符合研究标准。病例组和对照组分别由158名和316名儿童组成。在未就诊就离开的儿童中,24名(15%)被分诊为“紧急”,且没有一名儿童的CTAS评分低于3。共有99名(63%)离开的儿童被其家人带到其他地方接受进一步治疗,而留下来的儿童中有89名(28%)被带到其他地方。等待时间过长和症状缓解分别占提前离开的92名(58%)和59名(37%)。一名未就诊就离开的儿童随后被收住入院。多因素分析显示,在调整了到达时间和到达急诊科的时间后,未就诊就离开的儿童的严重程度低于留下来的儿童(优势比[OR]为4.0,95%置信区间[CI]为2.2 - 7.2),并且更有可能在午夜至凌晨4点之间在急诊科登记(OR为5.9,95%CI为2.8 - 12.5)。提前离开组的儿童也更有可能被带到其他地方接受后续治疗(未调整的OR为4.3,95%CI为2.9 - 6.4)。
未就诊就离开急诊科的儿童的严重程度较低,并且与留下来的儿童相比,更有可能被带到其他地方接受后续治疗。大多数离开的儿童是因为等待时间过长或症状缓解。