Suppr超能文献

早期快速 acuity 评分能提供有关急诊科擅自离院的更完整数据。

Early quick acuity score provides more complete data on emergency department walkouts.

作者信息

Lovett Paris B, Kahn J Akiva, Greene Stuart E, Bloch Matthew A, Brandt Daniel R, Minckler Michael R

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Little Company of Mary Hospital, Torrance, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085776. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many prior studies have compared the acuity of Emergency Department (ED) patients who have Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) against non-LWBS patients. A weakness in these studies is that patients may walk out prior to the assignment of a triage score, biasing comparisons. We report an operational change whereby acuity was assessed immediately upon patient arrival. We hypothesized more patients would receive acuity scores with EQAS. We also sought to compare LWBS and non-LWBS patient characteristics with reduced bias.

SETTING

urban, academic medical center. Retrospective cohort study, electronic chart review, collecting data on all ED patients presenting between 4/1/2010 and 10/31/2011 ("Traditional Acuity Score" period, TAS) and from 11/1/2011 to 3/31/2012 ("Early Quick Acuity Score" period, EQAS). We recorded disposition (LWBS versus non-LWBS), acuity and demographics. For each subject during the EQAS period, we calculated how many prior ED visits and how many prior walkouts the subject had had during the TAS period.

RESULTS

Acuity was recorded in 92,275 of 94,526 patients (97.6%) for TAS period, and 25,577 of 25,760 patients (99.3%) for EQAS period, a difference of 1.7% (1.5%, 1.8%). LWBS patients had acuity scores recorded in 5,180 of 7,040 cases (73.6%) during TAS period, compared with 897 of 1,010 cases (88.8%) during the EQAS period, a difference of 15.2% (14.8%, 15.7%). LWBS were more likely than non-LWBS to be male, were younger and had lower acuity scores. LWBS averaged 5.3 prior ED visits compared with 2.8 by non-LWBS, a difference of 2.5 (1.5, 3.5). LWBS averaged 1.3 prior ED walkouts compared with 0.2 among non-LWBS, a difference of 1.1 (0.8, 1.3).

CONCLUSIONS

EQAS resulted in a higher proportion of patients receiving acuity scores, particularly among LWBS. This offers more complete data when comparing LWBS and non-LWBS patient characteristics. The comparison reinforced findings from prior studies.

摘要

引言

许多先前的研究比较了未经诊治自行离开(LWBS)急诊科患者与未LWBS患者的病情严重程度。这些研究的一个不足之处在于,患者可能在分诊评分分配之前就自行离开,从而使比较产生偏差。我们报告了一项操作变更,即患者一到院就立即评估病情严重程度。我们假设更多患者会通过早期快速病情严重程度评分(EQAS)获得病情严重程度评分。我们还试图在减少偏差的情况下比较LWBS和非LWBS患者的特征。

设置

城市学术医疗中心。回顾性队列研究,电子病历审查,收集2010年4月1日至2011年10月31日期间(“传统病情严重程度评分”时期,TAS)以及2011年11月1日至2012年3月31日期间(“早期快速病情严重程度评分”时期,EQAS)所有急诊科就诊患者的数据。我们记录了处置情况(LWBS与非LWBS)、病情严重程度和人口统计学数据。对于EQAS时期的每个受试者,我们计算了其在TAS时期的急诊科就诊次数和自行离开次数。

结果

TAS时期94,526例患者中有92,275例(97.6%)记录了病情严重程度,EQAS时期25,760例患者中有25,577例(99.3%)记录了病情严重程度,差异为1.7%(1.5%,1.8%)。TAS时期7,040例LWBS患者中有5,180例(7

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Hospital determinants of emergency department left without being seen rates.急诊未就诊率的医院决定因素。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):24-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验