Watrin Françoise, Le Meur Elodie, Roeckel Nathalie, Ripoche Marie-Anne, Dandolo Luisa, Muscatelli Françoise
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 6156, IBDM, Parc scientifique de Luminy, Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France.
BMC Genet. 2005 Jan 5;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-1.
The human Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) domain and its mouse orthologue include a cluster of paternally expressed genes which imprinted expression is co-ordinately regulated by an imprinting center (IC) closely associated to the Snurf-Snrpn gene. Besides their co-regulated imprinted expression, two observations suggest that the spatio-temporal expression of these genes could also be co-regulated. First, the PWS genes have all been reported to be expressed in the mouse nervous system. Second, Snurf-Snrpn and its associated IC are the most ancient elements of the domain which later acquired additional functional genes by retrotransposition. Although located at least 1.5 megabases from the IC, these retroposons acquired the same imprinted regulation as Snurf-Snrpn. In this study, we ask whether the IC, in addition to its function in imprinting, could also be involved in the spatio-temporal regulation of genes in the PWS domain.
We compared the expression pattern of Snurf-Snrpn and C/D-box small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) MBII-85 and MBII-52 to the expression pattern of the two evolutionary related retroposons Ndn and Magel2, in the developing mouse embryo. We show that these genes have highly similar expression patterns in the central nervous system, suggesting that they share a common central nervous system-specific regulatory element. Among these genes, Ndn and Magel2 display the most similar expression patterns. Using transgenic mice containing the Ndn and Magel2 genes, we show that the transgenic Ndn gene whereas not imprinted is correctly expressed. Search for DNase I hypersensitive sites in the Ndn-Magel2 genomic region and comparative genomic analyses were performed in order to identify potential transcriptional cis-regulatory elements.
These results strongly suggest that paternally expressed genes of the PWS domain share a common central nervous system-specific regulatory element. We proposed that this regulatory element could co-localize with the IC. However, we demonstrate that the IC, if required for imprinted regulation, is not involved in the spatio-temporal regulation of distantly located retrotransposed genes such as the Ndn gene in the PWS domain.
人类普拉德-威利综合征(PWS)区域及其小鼠同源区域包含一组父源表达基因,其印记表达由与Snurf-Snrpn基因紧密相关的印记中心(IC)协同调控。除了它们共同调控的印记表达外,两项观察结果表明这些基因的时空表达也可能受到协同调控。第一,所有PWS基因均已报道在小鼠神经系统中表达。第二,Snurf-Snrpn及其相关的IC是该区域最古老的元件,后来通过逆转座作用获得了额外的功能基因。尽管这些逆转座子距离IC至少1.5兆碱基,但它们获得了与Snurf-Snrpn相同的印记调控。在本研究中,我们探讨IC除了其在印记中的功能外,是否还可能参与PWS区域基因的时空调控。
我们将Snurf-Snrpn和C/D盒小核仁RNA(snoRNA)MBII-85和MBII-52的表达模式与发育中的小鼠胚胎中两个进化相关的逆转座子Ndn和Magel2的表达模式进行了比较。我们发现这些基因在中枢神经系统中具有高度相似的表达模式,表明它们共享一个共同的中枢神经系统特异性调控元件。在这些基因中,Ndn和Magel2显示出最相似的表达模式。使用含有Ndn和Magel2基因的转基因小鼠,我们发现转基因Ndn基因虽然没有印记,但表达正确。为了鉴定潜在的转录顺式调控元件,我们在Ndn-Magel2基因组区域进行了DNase I超敏位点搜索和比较基因组分析。
这些结果强烈表明PWS区域的父源表达基因共享一个共同的中枢神经系统特异性调控元件。我们推测该调控元件可能与IC共定位。然而,我们证明IC如果是印记调控所必需的,则不参与PWS区域中远距离逆转座基因如Ndn基因的时空调控。