Hartnell G F, Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg M R
Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO 63167, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2005 Feb;83(2):400-7. doi: 10.2527/2005.832400x.
The objective of this digestibility assessment was to determine whether there are significant differences in the digestibility of Roundup Ready (glyphosate-tolerant) and conventional sugar beet, fodder beet, and beet pulp produced from sugar beet varieties when fed to sheep (seven wethers per treatment group). Three experiments were conducted in this assessment. Experiment 1 (35 wethers) compared one glyphosate-tolerant fodder beet variety with four conventional varieties, Exp. 2 (42 wethers) compared one glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet variety with five conventional varieties, and Exp. 3 (42 wethers) compared beet pulp derived from glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet with beet pulp from five European locations. The experimental phase consisted of a 2-wk preliminary period followed by a 1-wk collection period for Exp. 1 and 2, and a 1-wk preliminary period followed by a 1-wk digestibility collection period for Exp. 3. Diets were comprised of grass hay at 30, 30, and 20% of DM for Exp. 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with the balance being beet components. Urea and sodium sulfate were supplemented (8 and 2.9 g, respectively, for Exp. 1 and 2; and 6 g and 2.16 g, respectively, for Exp. 3) to supply sufficient dietary N and S. Each diet was fed to sheep (96 +/- 0.9 kg) in the three experiments to at or near maintenance energy levels. Treatment differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, and DE for glyphosate-tolerant fodder and sugar beets did not differ from those for commercial fodder and sugar beets in Exp. 1 and 2. There were differences (P < 0.05) in DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, and DE digestibilities influenced by the different varieties of beet pulp in Exp. 3, but these were not unique to just the Roundup Ready sugar beet variety. Digestibilities and feeding values of Roundup Ready fodder beet, sugar beet, and beet pulp produced from Roundup Ready sugar beet varieties were not influenced by the introduction of the Roundup Ready trait compared with conventional varieties.
本次消化率评估的目的是确定抗草甘膦(耐草甘膦)甜菜品种与常规甜菜品种生产的糖用甜菜、饲料甜菜及甜菜粕在喂给绵羊时(每个处理组7只阉羊)的消化率是否存在显著差异。本次评估进行了三项试验。试验1(35只阉羊)将一个抗草甘膦饲料甜菜品种与四个常规品种进行比较,试验2(42只阉羊)将一个抗草甘膦糖用甜菜品种与五个常规品种进行比较,试验3(42只阉羊)将抗草甘膦糖用甜菜制成的甜菜粕与来自欧洲五个地区的甜菜粕进行比较。试验阶段包括试验1和试验2为期2周的预饲期,随后是为期1周的收集期;试验3为期1周的预饲期,随后是为期1周的消化率收集期。试验1、2和3的日粮分别由占干物质30%、30%和20%的禾本科干草组成,其余为甜菜成分。补充尿素和硫酸钠(试验1和试验2分别为8克和2.9克;试验3分别为6克和2.16克)以提供足够的日粮氮和硫。在三项试验中,每种日粮均喂给体重为96±0.9千克的绵羊,使其达到或接近维持能量水平。当P<0.05时,认为处理差异显著。在试验1和试验2中,抗草甘膦饲料甜菜和糖用甜菜的干物质、有机物、粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维和消化能的表观消化率与商品饲料甜菜和糖用甜菜的表观消化率没有差异。试验3中,不同品种的甜菜粕对干物质、有机物、粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维和消化能的消化率有差异(P<0.05),但这些差异并非仅针对抗草甘膦糖用甜菜品种。与常规品种相比,抗草甘膦饲料甜菜、糖用甜菜以及由抗草甘膦糖用甜菜品种生产的甜菜粕的消化率和饲喂价值不受抗草甘膦性状引入的影响。