Bayer CropScience, St. Louis, MO.
J Anim Sci. 2019 Nov 4;97(11):4509-4518. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz295.
Glyphosate is a nonselective systemic herbicide used in agriculture since 1974. It inhibits 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase, an enzyme in the shikimate pathway present in cells of plants and some microorganisms but not human or other animal cells. Glyphosate-tolerant crops have been commercialized for more than 20 yr using a transgene from a resistant bacterial EPSP synthase that renders the crops insensitive to glyphosate. Much of the forage or grain from these crops are consumed by farm animals. Glyphosate protects crop yields, lowers the cost of feed production, and reduces CO2 emissions attributable to agriculture by reducing tillage and fuel usage. Despite these benefits and even though global regulatory agencies continue to reaffirm its safety, the public hears conflicting information about glyphosate's safety. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determines for every agricultural chemical a maximum daily allowable human exposure (called the reference dose, RfD). The RfD is based on amounts that are 1/100th (for sensitive populations) to 1/1,000th (for children) the no observed adverse effects level (NOAEL) identified through a comprehensive battery of animal toxicology studies. Recent surveys for residues have indicated that amounts of glyphosate in food/feed are at or below established tolerances and actual intakes for humans or livestock are much lower than these conservative exposure limits. While the EPSP synthase of some bacteria is sensitive to glyphosate, in vivo or in vitro dynamic culture systems with mixed bacteria and media that resembles rumen digesta have not demonstrated an impact on microbial function from adding glyphosate. Moreover, one chemical characteristic of glyphosate cited as a reason for concern is that it is a tridentate chelating ligand for divalent and trivalent metals; however, other more potent chelators are ubiquitous in livestock diets, such as certain amino acids. Regulatory testing identifies potential hazards, but risks of these hazards need to be evaluated in the context of realistic exposures and conditions. Conclusions about safety should be based on empirical results within the limitations of model systems or experimental design. This review summarizes how pesticide residues, particularly glyphosate, in food and feed are quantified, and how their safety is determined by regulatory agencies to establish safe use levels.
草甘膦是一种非选择性的系统性除草剂,自 1974 年以来就在农业中使用。它抑制 5-烯醇丙酮酰莽草酸-3-磷酸(EPSP)合酶,这种酶存在于植物和一些微生物的细胞中,但不存在于人类或其他动物细胞中。利用一种抗草甘膦的细菌 EPSP 合酶的转基因,已经商业化了 20 多年的耐草甘膦作物,使作物对草甘膦不敏感。这些作物的大部分饲料或谷物都被农场动物食用。草甘膦保护作物产量,降低饲料生产成本,并通过减少耕作和燃料使用减少农业归因的二氧化碳排放。尽管有这些好处,甚至全球监管机构继续重申其安全性,但公众听到的关于草甘膦安全性的信息相互矛盾。美国环境保护署(EPA)为每一种农业化学品确定了人类最大日允许暴露量(称为参考剂量,RfD)。RfD 基于通过全面的动物毒理学研究确定的无观察不良效应水平(NOAEL)的 1/100(对敏感人群)到 1/1000(对儿童)。最近的残留调查表明,食物/饲料中的草甘膦含量在已建立的容忍度范围内或以下,人类或牲畜的实际摄入量远低于这些保守的暴露限值。虽然一些细菌的 EPSP 合酶对草甘膦敏感,但在含有混合细菌和类似于瘤胃消化物的培养基的体内或体外动态培养系统中,添加草甘膦并没有对微生物功能产生影响。此外,草甘膦被引用为令人担忧的一个化学特性是,它是二价和三价金属的三齿螯合配体;然而,其他更有效的螯合剂在牲畜饲料中无处不在,如某些氨基酸。监管测试确定了潜在的危害,但需要在实际暴露和条件下评估这些危害的风险。关于安全性的结论应该基于模型系统或实验设计限制内的经验结果。本综述总结了食品和饲料中农药残留,特别是草甘膦的定量方法,以及监管机构如何通过确定安全使用水平来确定其安全性。