Frank James A, McAuley Danny F, Gutierrez Jorge A, Daniel Brian M, Dobbs Leland, Matthay Michael A
Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1):181-8; discussion 254-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000150663.45778.c4.
The role of recruitment maneuvers in mechanical ventilation for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury remains uncertain in part due to a lack of data on the effects of specific recruitment maneuvers on lung injury severity. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of one type of recruitment maneuver--sustained inflation--on alveolar epithelial and lung endothelial injury in experimental acute lung injury.
Randomized experimental study.
Academic research laboratory.
Forty-nine Sprague-Dawley rats.
Lung injury was induced in anesthetized, ventilated rats by instillation of acid (pH 1.5) into the airspaces. Rats were ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H(2)O with or without a sustained inflation recruitment maneuver repeated every 30 mins. Each recruitment maneuver consisted of two 30-sec inflations to total lung capacity (30 cm H(2)O) 1 min apart.
The use of recruitment maneuvers significantly improved oxygenation, compliance, end-expiratory lung volume, functional residual capacity, and deadspace fraction. Recruitment maneuvers reduced extravascular lung water and lung endothelial injury as measured by protein permeability (217 +/- 28 vs. 314 +/- 70 extravascular plasma equivalents [microL], p < .05). However, recruitment maneuvers did not prevent alveolar epithelial injury. Epithelial permeability and bronchoalveolar lavage RTI40 levels, a marker of type I cell injury, were similar with or without recruitment maneuvers. Recruitment maneuvers decreased epithelial fluid transport, a functional marker of epithelial injury. Recruitment maneuvers did not reduce markers of airspace inflammation.
Sustained inflation recruitment maneuvers improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation and may protect the lung endothelium but do not reduce alveolar epithelial injury. Because of the differential effects of recruitment maneuvers on the lung endothelium and alveolar epithelium, the net effect in clinical acute lung injury may not be beneficial. Additional clinical studies will be needed to assess the net impact of recruitment maneuvers in patients with acute lung injury.
对于急性呼吸窘迫综合征和急性肺损伤患者,在机械通气中使用肺复张手法的作用仍不明确,部分原因是缺乏关于特定肺复张手法对肺损伤严重程度影响的数据。本研究的主要目的是确定一种肺复张手法——持续肺膨胀——对实验性急性肺损伤中肺泡上皮和肺内皮损伤的影响。
随机实验研究。
学术研究实验室。
49只Sprague-Dawley大鼠。
在麻醉、机械通气的大鼠中,通过向气腔滴注酸(pH 1.5)诱导肺损伤。大鼠以6 mL/kg的潮气量和5 cm H₂O的呼气末正压进行通气,每30分钟重复进行或不进行持续肺膨胀肺复张手法。每次肺复张手法包括两次30秒的充气至肺总量(30 cm H₂O),间隔1分钟。
使用肺复张手法显著改善了氧合、顺应性、呼气末肺容积、功能残气量和死腔分数。通过蛋白通透性测量,肺复张手法减少了血管外肺水和肺内皮损伤(血管外血浆当量分别为217±28与314±70 [微升],p <.05)。然而,肺复张手法并未预防肺泡上皮损伤。无论有无肺复张手法,上皮通透性和支气管肺泡灌洗RTI40水平(I型细胞损伤的标志物)相似。肺复张手法降低了上皮液体转运,这是上皮损伤的一个功能标志物。肺复张手法并未降低气腔炎症标志物。
持续肺膨胀肺复张手法可改善呼吸力学和氧合,可能保护肺内皮,但不能减轻肺泡上皮损伤。由于肺复张手法对肺内皮和肺泡上皮的影响不同,在临床急性肺损伤中的净效应可能并无益处。需要更多的临床研究来评估肺复张手法对急性肺损伤患者的净影响。