Bohannon Richard W
School of Allied Health, University of Connecticut, The Stroke Center, Hartford Hospital, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Dec;99(3 Pt 1):813-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.3.813-817.
Simple measures are sometimes used to characterize weakness in the upper limb after stroke, but their reliability and validity remain uncertain. Here, we examined the adequacy of three measures relative to dynamometer measurements of 26 patients (15 women and 11 men, M age=70.1 +/- 11.7 yr.) with acute stroke. The strength of the involved upper limb was characterized using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Motor Functions-Arm (drift test), the Stroke Impact Scale: Arm and Hand (self-report), and objective dynamometry. Correlations between the simple measures and dynamometry were significant (r(s)=.70-.87). However, none of the 8 patients who achieved the best NIH scale-Arm score (0: no drift) self-reported having "a lot of strength." Dynamometry indicated that the strength of these patients was less than 50% of that expected according to published norms. The three simple measures examined had convergent validity, but drift, as scored on the NIH scale, was not sensitive to mild or moderate weakness of the upper limb after stroke.
简单的测量方法有时用于描述中风后上肢的无力情况,但其可靠性和有效性仍不确定。在此,我们针对26例急性中风患者(15名女性和11名男性,平均年龄 = 70.1 ± 11.7岁),检验了三种测量方法相对于握力计测量的充分性。使用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表:运动功能 - 手臂(漂移试验)、卒中影响量表:手臂和手部(自我报告)以及客观握力测量来描述受累上肢的力量。简单测量方法与握力测量之间的相关性显著(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数r(s)=.70 -.87)。然而,在8例美国国立卫生研究院量表 - 手臂得分最佳(0:无漂移)的患者中,没有一人自我报告有“很强的力量”。握力测量表明,这些患者的力量小于根据已发表标准预期值的50%。所检验的三种简单测量方法具有收敛效度,但美国国立卫生研究院量表上所记录的漂移对中风后上肢的轻度或中度无力并不敏感