Suppr超能文献

在使用β受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭患者时,理想的静息心率应该是多少?美托洛尔缓释片随机干预慢性心力衰竭试验(MERIT-HF)的经验。

What resting heart rate should one aim for when treating patients with heart failure with a beta-blocker? Experiences from the Metoprolol Controlled Release/Extended Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic Heart Failure (MERIT-HF).

作者信息

Gullestad Lars, Wikstrand John, Deedwania Prakash, Hjalmarson Ake, Egstrup Kenneth, Elkayam Uri, Gottlieb Stephen, Rashkow Andrew, Wedel Hans, Bermann Georgina, Kjekshus John

机构信息

Baerums Sykehus, Baerum, Norway.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 18;45(2):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.032.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to explore the question: what resting heart rate (HR) should one aim for when treating patients with heart failure with a beta-blocker?

BACKGROUND

The interaction of pretreatment and achieved resting HR with the risk-reducing effect of beta-blocker treatment needs further evaluation.

METHODS

Cardiovascular risk and risk reduction were analyzed in five subgroups defined by quintiles (Q) of pretreatment resting HR in the Metoprolol Controlled Release/Extended Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic Heart Failure (MERIT-HF).

RESULTS

Mean baseline HR in the 5 Qs were 71, 76, 81, 87, and 98 beats/min; achieved HR 63, 66, 68, 72, and 75 beats/min; and net change -8, -10, -11, -13, and -14 beats/min, respectively. Baseline HR was related to a number of baseline characteristics. Cardiovascular risk was no different in Q1 to Q4 (placebo groups) but increased in Q5 (HR above 90 beats/min). No relationship was observed between the risk-reducing effect of metoprolol controlled release/extended release (CR/XL) and baseline HR in the five Qs of baseline HR, or achieved HR, or change in HR during follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Metoprolol CR/XL significantly reduced mortality and hospitalizations independent of resting baseline HR, achieved HR, and change in HR. Achieved HR and change in HR during follow-up were closely related to baseline HR; therefore, it was not possible to answer the question posed. Instead, one has to apply a very simple rule: aim for the target beta-blocker dose used in clinical trials, and strive for the highest tolerated dose in all patients with heart failure, regardless of baseline and achieved HR.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是探讨以下问题:使用β受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭患者时,应将静息心率(HR)控制在多少?

背景

治疗前静息心率与β受体阻滞剂治疗的风险降低效果之间的相互作用需要进一步评估。

方法

在美托洛尔控释/缓释随机干预慢性心力衰竭试验(MERIT-HF)中,根据治疗前静息心率的五分位数(Q)将患者分为五个亚组,分析心血管风险及风险降低情况。

结果

五个Q组的平均基线心率分别为71、76、81、87和98次/分钟;达到的心率分别为63、66、68、72和75次/分钟;净变化分别为-8、-10、-11、-13和-14次/分钟。基线心率与一些基线特征相关。Q1至Q4(安慰剂组)的心血管风险无差异,但Q5(心率高于90次/分钟)的风险增加。在基线心率的五个Q组中,美托洛尔控释/缓释(CR/XL)的风险降低效果与基线心率、达到的心率或随访期间心率变化之间均未观察到相关性。

结论

美托洛尔CR/XL显著降低死亡率和住院率,与静息基线心率、达到的心率及心率变化无关。随访期间达到的心率和心率变化与基线心率密切相关;因此,无法回答提出的问题。相反,必须应用一个非常简单的规则:以临床试验中使用的目标β受体阻滞剂剂量为目标,并在所有心力衰竭患者中争取达到最高耐受剂量,无论基线心率和达到的心率如何。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验