Suppr超能文献

正常受试者和哮喘患者的深吸气回避与乙酰甲胆碱反应

Deep inspiration avoidance and methacholine response in normal subjects and patients with asthma.

作者信息

Simard Barbara, Turcotte Hélène, Cockcroft Donald W, Davis Beth E, Boulay Marie-Eve, Boulet Louis-Philippe

机构信息

Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l'Université Laval, Hôpital Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 2005 Jan;127(1):135-42. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.1.135.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep inspiration (DI) avoidance and time intervals between inhalation and measurement of FEV1 may influence methacholine challenges.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To compare the degree of airway response to methacholine when the initial FEV1 measurements are obtained either 30 s or 3 min after inhalation, (2) to evaluate a simplified method to study the influence of DI avoidance before inhalation on the fall in FEV1, and (3) to determine if methacholine has a cumulative effect.

PARTICIPANTS/METHODS: Twenty-five patients with asthma and 21 normal subjects without asthma. Four methacholine inhalation tests (MITs) were performed: two standard tidal-breathing MITs, with the first FEV1 measured 30 s (test A) and 3 min (test B) after the end of inhalation; a single-dose MIT, using the last concentration from test B, with no control of DI and the first FEV1 obtained 3 min after inhalation (test C); and an identical single-dose MIT preceded by 20-min of DI avoidance (test D). We compared the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) from tests A and B (aim 1), the percentage fall in FEV1 from tests C and D (aim 2), and the percentage fall in FEV1 from tests B and C (aim 3).

RESULTS

Mean PC20 values from tests A and B were 1.5 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL (p = 0.002) in patients with asthma, and 69.8 mg/mL and 29.9 mg/mL (p < 0.0001) in control subjects, respectively. The mean falls in FEV1 for tests C and D were 22.0% and 24.5% (p > 0.05) in patients with asthma, and 22.1% and 38.9% (p = 0.0005) in control subjects, respectively. The mean falls in FEV2 for tests B and C were 30.2% and 22.0% (p = 0.01) in patients with asthma, and 27.5% and 22.1% (p > 0.05) in control subjects, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In both groups, the longer the time interval between the end of inhalation and the first FEV2 measurement, the greater the fall in FEV2 (lower PC20). DI avoidance before inhalation does not enhance the fall in FEV2 in subjects with asthma, while it does in control subjects. Methacholine has a slight cumulative effect that is significant in patients with asthma (p = 0.007).

摘要

背景

避免深吸气(DI)以及吸气与测量第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)之间的时间间隔可能会影响乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。

目的

(1)比较在吸气后30秒或3分钟获得初始FEV1测量值时,气道对乙酰甲胆碱的反应程度;(2)评估一种简化方法,以研究吸气前避免深吸气对FEV1下降的影响;(3)确定乙酰甲胆碱是否具有累积效应。

参与者/方法:25例哮喘患者和21名无哮喘的正常受试者。进行了四项乙酰甲胆碱吸入试验(MITs):两项标准潮气呼吸MITs,在吸气结束后30秒(试验A)和3分钟(试验B)测量第一FEV1;一项单剂量MIT,使用试验B的最后浓度,不控制深吸气,在吸气后3分钟获得第一FEV1(试验C);以及一项相同的单剂量MIT,在吸气前先避免深吸气20分钟(试验D)。我们比较了试验A和试验B中导致FEV1下降20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发浓度(PC20)(目标1)、试验C和试验D中FEV1的下降百分比(目标2)以及试验B和试验C中FEV1的下降百分比(目标3)。

结果

哮喘患者试验A和试验B的平均PC20值分别为1.5毫克/毫升和1.0毫克/毫升(p = 0.002),对照组分别为69.8毫克/毫升和29.9毫克/毫升(p < 0.0001)。哮喘患者试验C和试验D中FEV1的平均下降分别为22.0%和24.5%(p > 0.05),对照组分别为22.1%和38.9%(p = 0.0005)。哮喘患者试验B和试验C中FEV2的平均下降分别为30.2%和22.0%(p = 0.01),对照组分别为27.5%和22.1%(p > 0.05)。

结论

在两组中,吸气结束与首次测量FEV2之间的时间间隔越长,FEV2下降越大(PC20越低)。吸气前避免深吸气在哮喘患者中不会增强FEV2的下降,而在对照组中会增强。乙酰甲胆碱有轻微的累积效应,在哮喘患者中具有统计学意义(p = 0.007)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验