Dell Sharon D, Bola Sundeep S, Foty Richard G, Marshall Laura C, Nelligan Kathleen A, Coates Allan L
1 Division of Respiratory Medicine, and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Mar;12(3):357-63. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC.
The American Thoracic Society guidelines (1999) for methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) using the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol were developed for the now-obsolete English-Wright (EW) nebulizer. In addition, the guideline recommendation to use the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PC20) rather than the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) for determining the level of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been challenged.
To determine if cumulative dose or concentration of methacholine delivered to the airways is the determinant for airway responsiveness and to validate use of the AeroEclipse* II BAN (Aero; Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) nebulizer compared with use of the reference standard EW nebulizer.
Subjects with asthma (10-18 yr old) participated in randomized, controlled cross-over experiments comparing four MCT protocols using standard methacholine concentrations, but varying: (1) methacholine starting concentration (testing for cumulative effect); (2) nebulizer (EW versus Aero); and (3) inhalation time. PD20 was calculated using nebulizer output rate, inhalation time, and preceding doses delivered. ANOVA analyses were used to compare geometric means of PC20 and PD20 between protocols.
A total of 32 subjects (17 male) participated. PC20 differed when starting concentration varied (0.46 vs. 0.80 mg/ml; P<0.0001), whereas PD20 did not (0.06 vs. 0.08 mg). PC20 differed with the EW versus the Aero nebulzer with 30-second inhalation (1.19 vs. 0.43 mg/ml; P=0.0006) and the EW versus the Aero nebulizer with 20-second inhalation (1.91 vs. 0.89 mg/ml; P=0.0027), whereas PD20 did not (0.07 vs. 0.06 mg and 0.11 vs. 0.09 mg, respectively).
In MCTs, the cumulative dose (PD20), not the PC20, determines bronchial responsiveness. Modern nebulizers may be used for the test if clinical interpretation is based on PD20. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01288482).
美国胸科学会1999年发布的关于使用2分钟潮气呼吸方案进行乙酰甲胆碱激发试验(MCT)的指南是针对现已过时的英式赖特(EW)雾化器制定的。此外,指南中关于使用导致第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发浓度(PC20)而非导致FEV1下降20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发剂量(PD20)来确定支气管高反应性水平的建议受到了质疑。
确定输送至气道的乙酰甲胆碱累积剂量或浓度是否是气道反应性的决定因素,并验证与参考标准EW雾化器相比,使用AeroEclipse* II BAN(Aero;加拿大安大略省伦敦市Trudell Medical International公司)雾化器的情况。
患有哮喘的受试者(10 - 18岁)参与了随机对照交叉实验,比较了四种使用标准乙酰甲胆碱浓度但存在差异的MCT方案:(1)乙酰甲胆碱起始浓度(测试累积效应);(2)雾化器(EW与Aero);(3)吸入时间。使用雾化器输出率、吸入时间和之前输送的剂量来计算PD20。采用方差分析来比较各方案之间PC20和PD20的几何均值。
共有32名受试者(17名男性)参与。当起始浓度不同时,PC20存在差异(0.46对0.80 mg/ml;P<0.0001),而PD20无差异(0.06对0.08 mg)。使用EW雾化器与Aero雾化器且吸入时间为30秒时,PC20存在差异(1.19对0.43 mg/ml;P = 0.0006),使用EW雾化器与Aero雾化器且吸入时间为20秒时,PC20也存在差异(1.91对0.89 mg/ml;P = 0.0027),而PD20无差异(分别为0.07对0.06 mg和0.11对0.09 mg)。
在MCT中,是累积剂量(PD20)而非PC20决定支气管反应性。如果基于PD20进行临床解读,现代雾化器可用于该试验。在www.clinicaltrials.gov网站注册的临床试验(NCT01288482)。