Mashima Yukihiko
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Dec;108(12):863-85; discussion 886.
Human diseases develop by complex mutual relationships of genetic and environmental factors. In inherited diseases, DNA diagnosis of the disease-causing genes provides a confirmation of the disease. On the other hand, DNA diagnosis of the disease-sensitive genes in multifactorial diseases, such as the lifestyle-related diseases (common diseases), provides the risk of developing the disease. Two new technologies are being used for DNA diagnosis in the clinic. The first is called Invader Technology and is a non-PCR method and is useful for detecting well-known genetic variations in large samples efficiently. We have developed a method to quantify the heteroplasmy of mitochondrial DNA mutations by this technique. The second technique, called WAVE, uses denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography to screen for mutations in a large number of samples automatically and efficiently. Clinical DNA diagnoses are divided into those for single genetic diseases and those for multifactorial diseases. The purposes for DNA diagnosis in single genetic diseases are: 1) to propose a new clinical classification of the disease, such as TGFB1-related corneal dystrophy or retinitis pigmentosa, based on the genotypes; 2) to confirm a clinical diagnosis, such as Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON); and 3) to provide an early diagnosis before the development of the disease and thus provide an opportunity to start early treatment. For example, a family history of glaucoma is one of the risk factors for developing glaucoma. The frequency of mutations in the glaucoma genes, myocilin and optineurin, were found to be about 3% and 0.25%, respectively, in Japanese. The significance of DNA diagnosis in multifactorial diseases is that it provides a risk diagnosis for an individual. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of disease-sensitive genes are associated with only a 2- to 3-fold risk of developing the disease. A case-control association study was performed using many SNP markers to identify glaucoma-sensitive genes. A total of 671 Japanese individuals, 201 POAG patients, 234 NTG patients, and 236 normal controls were examined. Fifty-two SNPs in the 38 genes were examined to identify the glaucoma-sensitive genes as candidate genes, and SNPs in AT 1, AT 2, PON 1, GSTT 1, NOS 3, and EDN 1 were associated with glaucoma statistically. Mitochondrial (mt) DNA mutations associated with LHON might be risk factors for open-angle glaucoma, because abnormal optic disc excavations are also found in LHON patients. A total of 651 blood samples were screened for 6 LHON-associated mutations with the Invader assay. Seven patients had one of the five mutations, but none had developed LHON. The 5 mutations were not identified in 236 normal controls. MtDNA mutations may make the optic disc more susceptible to damage in glaucoma patients. The clinical variability in LHON patients suggests that the disease most likely results from multi factorial mechanisms. To determine whether genetic polymorphisms for oxidative stress and apoptosis cause clinical variability in patients with LHON, 12 polymorphisms in 10 genes were analyzed in 87 patients with the 11778 mutation in relation to the age at onset and final visual acuity. LHON patients carrying homozygous His 113 in the EPHX1 gene or homozygous Arg 72 in the TP53 gene developed the disease earlier than those without this genotype. Thus, nuclear genetic polymorphisms related to oxidative stress or apoptosis may modify the age of LHON onset. A clinical trial of 38 healthy volunteers without systemic diseases or eye diseases was performed using an angiotensin II receptor blocker (candesartan cilexetil) as an alternative drug for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). After a single oral dose of candesartan cilexetil, the IOP fell significantly for 24 hr. There was no association between the effects of oral candesartan cilexetil and the three SNPs in the AT 1 gene. In the 21th century, DNA diagnosis for multifactorial diseases will be required to determine the treatment plan for individuals or to prevent diseases. We have developed a panel of tests by Invader assay for clinical use to detect mutations in the myocilin gene or in LHON. In the future, we will develop a panel to detect SNPs in the glaucoma-sensitive genes to diagnose individuals at risk for developing glaucoma. Such information is expected to help develop new medications.
人类疾病是由遗传和环境因素的复杂相互关系发展而来的。在遗传性疾病中,对致病基因进行DNA诊断可确诊疾病。另一方面,对多因素疾病(如生活方式相关疾病,即常见疾病)中的疾病敏感基因进行DNA诊断,可提供患病风险。临床上正在使用两种新技术进行DNA诊断。第一种称为入侵检测技术,它是一种非聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法,可有效检测大样本中已知的基因变异。我们已经开发出一种利用该技术定量线粒体DNA突变异质性的方法。第二种技术称为WAVE,它使用变性高效液相色谱法自动、高效地筛选大量样本中的突变。临床DNA诊断分为单基因疾病诊断和多因素疾病诊断。单基因疾病DNA诊断的目的是:1)基于基因型提出疾病的新临床分类,如转化生长因子β1(TGFB1)相关角膜营养不良或视网膜色素变性;2)确诊临床诊断,如Leber遗传性视神经病变(LHON);3)在疾病发展前进行早期诊断,从而提供早期治疗的机会。例如,青光眼家族史是患青光眼的危险因素之一。在日本人中,青光眼相关基因肌纤蛋白(myocilin)和视神经元蛋白(optineurin)的突变频率分别约为3%和0.25%。多因素疾病中DNA诊断的意义在于为个体提供风险诊断。疾病敏感基因的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)仅使患病风险增加2至3倍。进行了一项病例对照关联研究,使用许多SNP标记来鉴定青光眼敏感基因。共检查了671名日本人,其中201例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者、234例正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者和236名正常对照。检测了38个基因中的52个SNP以鉴定青光眼敏感基因作为候选基因,其中1型血管紧张素Ⅱ受体(AT1)、2型血管紧张素Ⅱ受体(AT2)、对氧磷酶1(PON1)、谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1(GSTT1)、一氧化氮合酶3(NOS3)和内皮素1(EDN1)基因中的SNP与青光眼具有统计学关联。与LHON相关的线粒体(mt)DNA突变可能是开角型青光眼的危险因素,因为在LHON患者中也发现了异常的视盘凹陷。使用入侵检测法对651份血样进行了6种与LHON相关突变的筛查。7名患者有5种突变中的一种,但均未发生LHON。236名正常对照中未发现这5种突变。mtDNA突变可能使青光眼患者的视盘更容易受到损伤。LHON患者的临床变异性表明该疾病很可能是由多因素机制导致的。为了确定氧化应激和细胞凋亡的基因多态性是否会导致LHON患者出现临床变异性,对87例携带11778突变的患者的10个基因中的12个多态性进行了分析,涉及发病年龄和最终视力。携带EPHX1基因纯合组氨酸113或TP53基因纯合精氨酸72的LHON患者比没有这种基因型的患者发病更早。因此,与氧化应激或细胞凋亡相关的核基因多态性可能会改变LHON的发病年龄。对38名无全身性疾病或眼部疾病的健康志愿者进行了一项临床试验,使用血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(坎地沙坦酯)作为降低眼压(IOP)的替代药物。单次口服坎地沙坦酯后,IOP显著下降24小时。口服坎地沙坦酯的效果与AT1基因中的3种SNP之间没有关联。在21世纪,多因素疾病的DNA诊断将有助于确定个体的治疗方案或预防疾病。我们已经开发出一组用于临床的入侵检测法检测试剂盒,用于检测肌纤蛋白基因或LHON中的突变。未来,我们将开发一组检测青光眼敏感基因中SNP的试剂盒,以诊断有患青光眼风险的个体。这些信息有望有助于开发新的药物。