Pankratz Melinda M, Hallfors Denise D
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 1516 E. Franklin St., Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC 27514-2812, USA.
J Sch Health. 2004 Nov;74(9):353-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb06628.x.
The Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act (SDFSCA) provides funding for prevention education to nearly every school district in the nation. Recent federal policy requires SDFSCA recipients to implement evidence-based prevention programs. This paper reports the extent to which North Carolina public school districts implement evidence-based substance use prevention curricula. Results showed that while the majority of school districts use evidence-based prevention curricula, they are rarely the most commonly used curricula. Evidence-based curricula are much more likely to be used at the middle school level than at the elementary or high school levels. Urbanicity, coordinator time, and coordinator experience correlated with extensive use of evidence-based curricula in the bivariate analysis, but only time spent on prevention by the Safe and Drug-Free Schools (SDFS) coordinator significantly predicted extensive use in the multivariate analysis. Increasing district SDFSCA coordinator time is a necessary step for diffusing evidence-based curricula.
《安全无毒品学校与社区法案》（SDFSCA）为全国几乎每个学区的预防教育提供资金。最近的联邦政策要求SDFSCA的受助者实施基于证据的预防项目。本文报告了北卡罗来纳州公立学区实施基于证据的药物使用预防课程的程度。结果显示，虽然大多数学区使用基于证据的预防课程，但它们很少是最常用的课程。基于证据的课程在中学阶段比在小学或高中阶段更有可能被使用。在双变量分析中，城市性、协调员时间和协调员经验与基于证据的课程的广泛使用相关，但在多变量分析中，只有安全无毒品学校（SDFS）协调员在预防方面花费的时间显著预测了广泛使用。增加学区SDFSCA协调员的时间是推广基于证据的课程的必要步骤。
