Abella Benjamin S, Alvarado Jason P, Myklebust Helge, Edelson Dana P, Barry Anne, O'Hearn Nicholas, Vanden Hoek Terry L, Becker Lance B
Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill 60637, USA.
JAMA. 2005 Jan 19;293(3):305-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.3.305.
The survival benefit of well-performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is well-documented, but little objective data exist regarding actual CPR quality during cardiac arrest. Recent studies have challenged the notion that CPR is uniformly performed according to established international guidelines.
To measure multiple parameters of in-hospital CPR quality and to determine compliance with published American Heart Association and international guidelines.
A prospective observational study of 67 patients who experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest at the University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, between December 11, 2002, and April 5, 2004. Using a monitor/defibrillator with novel additional sensing capabilities, the parameters of CPR quality including chest compression rate, compression depth, ventilation rate, and the fraction of arrest time without chest compressions (no-flow fraction) were recorded.
Adherence to American Heart Association and international CPR guidelines.
Analysis of the first 5 minutes of each resuscitation by 30-second segments revealed that chest compression rates were less than 90/min in 28.1% of segments. Compression depth was too shallow (defined as <38 mm) for 37.4% of compressions. Ventilation rates were high, with 60.9% of segments containing a rate of more than 20/min. Additionally, the mean (SD) no-flow fraction was 0.24 (0.18). A 10-second pause each minute of arrest would yield a no-flow fraction of 0.17. A total of 27 patients (40.3%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation and 7 (10.4%) were discharged from the hospital.
In this study of in-hospital cardiac arrest, the quality of multiple parameters of CPR was inconsistent and often did not meet published guideline recommendations, even when performed by well-trained hospital staff. The importance of high-quality CPR suggests the need for rescuer feedback and monitoring of CPR quality during resuscitation efforts.
实施良好的心肺复苏(CPR)对生存的益处已有充分记录,但关于心脏骤停期间实际心肺复苏质量的客观数据却很少。最近的研究对按照既定国际指南统一实施心肺复苏这一观念提出了质疑。
测量院内心肺复苏质量的多个参数,并确定是否符合已发表的美国心脏协会及国际指南。
对2002年12月11日至2004年4月5日期间在伊利诺伊州芝加哥市芝加哥大学医院发生院内心脏骤停的67例患者进行前瞻性观察研究。使用具有新型附加传感功能的监护仪/除颤器,记录心肺复苏质量参数,包括胸外按压频率、按压深度、通气频率以及无胸外按压的骤停时间比例(无血流比例)。
遵循美国心脏协会及国际心肺复苏指南的情况。
对每次复苏最初5分钟按30秒时间段进行分析发现,28.1%的时间段胸外按压频率低于90次/分钟。37.4%的按压深度过浅(定义为<38毫米)。通气频率较高,60.9%的时间段通气频率超过20次/分钟。此外,平均(标准差)无血流比例为0.24(0.18)。每骤停1分钟暂停10秒会产生0.17的无血流比例。共有27例患者(40.3%)实现自主循环恢复,7例(10.4%)出院。
在这项关于院内心脏骤停的研究中,心肺复苏多个参数的质量不一致,且常常未达到已发表的指南建议,即使是由训练有素的医院工作人员实施时也是如此。高质量心肺复苏的重要性表明在复苏过程中需要为施救者提供反馈并监测心肺复苏质量。