Rodrigues Ricardo J, Alfaro Tiago M, Rebola Nelson, Oliveira Catarina R, Cunha Rodrigo A
Centre for Neuroscience of Coimbra, Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal.
J Neurochem. 2005 Feb;92(3):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02887.x.
The anti-Parkinsonian effect of glutamate metabotropic group 5 (mGluR5) and adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists is believed to result from their ability to postsynaptically control the responsiveness of the indirect pathway that is hyperfunctioning in Parkinson's disease. mGluR5 and A(2A) antagonists are also neuroprotective in brain injury models involving glutamate excitotoxicity. Thus, we hypothesized that the anti-Parkinsonian and neuroprotective effects of A(2A) and mGluR5 receptors might be related to their control of striatal glutamate release that actually triggers the indirect pathway. The A(2A) agonist, CGS21680 (1-30 nM) facilitated glutamate release from striatal nerve terminals up to 57%, an effect prevented by the A(2A) antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM). The mGluR5 agonist, CHPG (300-600 mum) also facilitated glutamate release up to 29%, an effect prevented by the mGluR5 antagonist, MPEP (10 microm). Both mGluR5 and A(2A) receptors were located in the active zone and 57 +/- 6% of striatal glutamatergic nerve terminals possessed both A(2A) and mGluR5 receptors, suggesting a presynaptic functional interaction. Indeed, submaximal concentrations of CGS21680 (1 nM) and CHPG (100 microm) synergistically facilitated glutamate release and the facilitation of glutamate release by 10 nM CGS21680 was prevented by 10 microm MPEP, whereas facilitation by 300 microm CHPG was prevented by 10 nM SCH58261. These results provide the first direct evidence that A(2A) and mGluR5 receptors are co-located in more than half of the striatal glutamatergic terminals where they facilitate glutamate release in a synergistic manner. This emphasizes the role of the modulation of glutamate release as a likely mechanism of action of these receptors both in striatal neuroprotection and in Parkinson's disease.
谷氨酸代谢型第5组(mGluR5)和腺苷A(2A)受体拮抗剂的抗帕金森病作用被认为源于它们在突触后控制间接通路反应性的能力,该间接通路在帕金森病中功能亢进。mGluR5和A(2A)拮抗剂在涉及谷氨酸兴奋性毒性的脑损伤模型中也具有神经保护作用。因此,我们推测A(2A)和mGluR5受体的抗帕金森病和神经保护作用可能与其对纹状体谷氨酸释放的控制有关,而纹状体谷氨酸释放实际上触发了间接通路。A(2A)激动剂CGS21680(1 - 30 nM)使纹状体神经末梢的谷氨酸释放增加了57%,该作用可被A(2A)拮抗剂SCH58261(50 nM)阻断。mGluR5激动剂CHPG(300 - 600 μM)也使谷氨酸释放增加了29%,该作用可被mGluR5拮抗剂MPEP(10 μM)阻断。mGluR5和A(2A)受体均位于活性区,57±6%的纹状体谷氨酸能神经末梢同时拥有A(2A)和mGluR5受体,提示存在突触前功能相互作用。实际上,亚最大浓度的CGS21680(1 nM)和CHPG(100 μM)协同促进谷氨酸释放,10 nM CGS21680促进谷氨酸释放的作用可被10 μM MPEP阻断,而300 μM CHPG促进谷氨酸释放的作用可被10 nM SCH58261阻断。这些结果提供了首个直接证据,表明A(2A)和mGluR5受体共定位在超过半数的纹状体谷氨酸能终末,在这些终末它们以协同方式促进谷氨酸释放。这强调了谷氨酸释放调节作为这些受体在纹状体神经保护和帕金森病中可能的作用机制的重要性。