Avezum Alvaro, Makdisse Marcia, Spencer Frederick, Gore Joel M, Fox Keith A A, Montalescot Gilles, Eagle Kim A, White Kami, Mehta Rajendra H, Knobel Elias, Collet Jean-Philippe
Dante Pazzanese Cardiology Institute, Research Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am Heart J. 2005 Jan;149(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.003.
Evidence-based cardiac therapies are underutilized in elderly patients. We assessed differences in practice patterns, comorbidities, and in-hospital event rates, by age and type of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
We studied 24165 ACS patients in 102 hospitals in 14 countries stratified by age.
Approximately two-thirds of patients were men, but this proportion decreased with age. In elderly patients (> or = 65 years), history of angina, transient ischemic attack/stroke, myocardial infarction(MI), congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, hypertension or atrial fibrillation were more common, and delay in seeking medical attention and non-ST-segment elevation MI were significantly higher. Aspirin, beta-blockers, thrombolytic therapy, statins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were prescribed less, while calcium antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed more often to elderly patients. Unfractionated heparin was prescribed more often in young patients, while low-molecular-weight heparins were similarly prescribed across all age groups. Coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention rates significantly decreased with age. The rate of CABG surgery was highest among patients aged 65-74 years (8.1%) and 55-64 years (7.7%), but reduced in the youngest (4.7%) and oldest (2.7%) groups. Major bleeding rates were 2-3% among patients aged < 65 years, and > 6% in those > or = 85 years. Hospital-mortality rates, adjusted for baseline risk differences, increased with age (odds ratio: 15.7 in patients > or = 85 years compared with those < 45 years).
Many elderly ACS patients do not receive evidence-based therapies, highlighting the need for clinical trials targeted specifically at elderly cohorts, and quality-of-care programs that reinforce the use of such therapies among these individuals.
循证心脏治疗在老年患者中未得到充分利用。我们按年龄和急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)类型评估了实践模式、合并症及院内事件发生率的差异。
我们研究了14个国家102家医院中按年龄分层的24165例ACS患者。
约三分之二的患者为男性,但这一比例随年龄下降。在老年患者(≥65岁)中,心绞痛、短暂性脑缺血发作/中风、心肌梗死(MI)、充血性心力衰竭、冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)、高血压或心房颤动病史更为常见,就医延迟和非ST段抬高型MI显著更高。阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、溶栓治疗、他汀类药物和糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的处方较少,而钙拮抗剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在老年患者中处方更频繁。普通肝素在年轻患者中处方更频繁,而低分子量肝素在所有年龄组中的处方相似。冠状动脉造影和经皮介入率随年龄显著降低。CABG手术率在65 - 74岁患者(8.1%)和55 - 64岁患者(7.7%)中最高,但在最年轻(4.7%)和最年长(2.7%)组中降低。年龄<65岁的患者主要出血率为2 - 3%,≥85岁的患者中>6%。经基线风险差异调整后的医院死亡率随年龄增加(≥85岁患者与<45岁患者相比的优势比:15.7)。
许多老年ACS患者未接受循证治疗,这凸显了针对老年人群体开展临床试验以及加强这些个体使用此类治疗的医疗质量项目之必要性。