Monteiro Pedro
Cardiology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I467-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001420.
Performance of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is mainly used in high-risk patients. Although potentially life-saving, patients undergoing early CABG are traditionally associated with a worse outcome than those not requiring CABG. Is this really true in an unselected ACS population? The aim of this study was to evaluate, in an ACS population, if the performance of CABG during the index hospitalization influences in-hospital outcome.
Retrospective analysis of a nationwide database of 12,988 ACS patients admitted since 2002. Of those, 267 patients underwent CABG during the index hospitalization (group A) and 12,721 did not (group B). Group B patients were further divided in 2 subgroups: those submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (group B1; n=3948) during the index hospitalization and those not submitted to mechanical revascularization (group B2; n =8773). Patients from group A more frequently had diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and previous angina; they were also more often on cardiovascular medication before admission. Patients that underwent CABG were more often in Killip class IV at admission (4.8% versus 1.4% versus 2.0%); they also received more nitrates and catecholamines. Left ventricular function was better in group B1. Group A patients were more often on mechanical ventilation and intra-aortic pump and they had more in-hospital complications (31.1% versus 18.7% versus 17.3%), namely recurrent angina, re-infarction, and mechanical complications. They had a more severe coronary anatomy and the culprit lesion was more frequently on the left main (7.7% versus 0.5% versus 2.2%). However, their in-hospital mortality was significantly lower (1.1% versus 2.2% versus 6.8%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that performance of early CABG was an independent predictor of lower mortality (odds ratio of 0.12), as were the use of low-molecular-weight heparins, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
In unselected patients admitted for ACS, performance of early CABG, despite being performed in higher-risk patients, is associated with very low in-hospital mortality, even when compared with the mortality of lower-risk population not submitted to early CABG. Therefore, early performance of this procedure should be considered more often in eligible patients.
在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)期间进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)主要用于高危患者。尽管CABG可能挽救生命,但传统上接受早期CABG的患者预后比那些不需要CABG的患者更差。在未经选择的ACS人群中真的如此吗?本研究的目的是评估在ACS人群中,首次住院期间进行CABG是否会影响住院结局。
对自2002年以来全国范围内12988例ACS患者的数据库进行回顾性分析。其中,267例患者在首次住院期间接受了CABG(A组),12721例未接受(B组)。B组患者进一步分为2个亚组:在首次住院期间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者(B1组;n = 3948)和未接受机械血运重建的患者(B2组;n = 8773)。A组患者糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、高血压和既往心绞痛的发生率更高;入院前使用心血管药物的频率也更高。接受CABG的患者入院时Killip分级为IV级的情况更常见(4.8% 对1.4% 对2.0%);他们还接受了更多的硝酸盐和儿茶酚胺治疗。B1组的左心室功能更好。A组患者机械通气和主动脉内球囊反搏的使用频率更高,院内并发症更多(31.1% 对18.7% 对17.3%),即复发性心绞痛、再梗死和机械并发症。他们的冠状动脉解剖结构更严重,罪犯病变更常位于左主干(7.7% 对0.5% 对2.2%)。然而,他们的院内死亡率显著更低(1.开胸手术:胸骨正中切口,常规切开心包,建立体外循环,阻断升主动脉,经主动脉根部顺行灌注心脏停搏液,心脏停跳后行冠状动脉搭桥术。吻合完成后开放升主动脉,心脏复跳,脱离体外循环,彻底止血,逐层关胸。
介入手术:经股动脉或桡动脉穿刺,置入动脉鞘管。经鞘管送入导引导管至冠状动脉开口,通过导引导管送入导丝,沿导丝送入球囊导管或支架输送系统至病变部位,进行球囊扩张或支架植入。术后拔出动脉鞘管,压迫止血。
术后处理:
监测生命体征:包括心率、血压、呼吸、血氧饱和度等,持续监测至少24小时。
心脏功能支持:根据患者情况使用正性肌力药物、血管活性药物等维持心脏功能。
抗凝治疗:术后常规使用抗凝药物,如肝素、华法林等,以防止血栓形成。
抗血小板治疗:使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷等抗血小板药物,以预防冠状动脉内血栓形成。
伤口护理:保持伤口清洁干燥,观察有无渗血、渗液等情况。
呼吸道管理:鼓励患者咳嗽、咳痰,必要时进行吸痰,预防肺部感染。
饮食管理:术后禁食6小时,之后可逐渐恢复饮食,从流食、半流食逐渐过渡到普食。
康复训练:术后早期进行床上活动,如翻身、四肢活动等,逐渐增加活动量,如坐起、床边站立、行走等。
饮食:继续保持低盐、低脂、低糖饮食,多吃蔬菜水果,控制体重。
运动:根据患者情况逐渐增加运动量,如散步、慢跑、太极拳等,但要避免过度劳累。
药物:严格按照医嘱按时服药,不得自行增减药量或停药。
定期复查:定期复查心电图、心脏超声、血脂、血糖等,以便及时发现问题并调整治疗方案。
生活方式:保持良好的生活习惯,戒烟限酒,避免情绪激动,保证充足的睡眠。
注意事项:告知患者如果出现胸痛、胸闷、心悸等症状,应及时就医。
1% 对2.2% 对6.8%;P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,早期CABG是降低死亡率的独立预测因素(比值比为0.12),低分子量肝素、β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用也是如此。
在因ACS入院的未经选择的患者中,尽管早期CABG是在高危患者中进行的,但与未接受早期CABG的低危人群的死亡率相比,其院内死亡率非常低。因此对于符合条件的患者,应更频繁地考虑早期进行该手术。