Schwarting Rainer K W, Borta Andreas
Experimental and Physiological Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Feb 15;141(2):251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.06.013.
When studying functional asymmetries in normal laboratory rats, several behavioral tests have been applied and proven their utility, including turning in rotometers or open-fields, handedness in paw usage, T-maze alternation, and others. Here, we analyzed male Wistar rats in two tests, namely the elevated plus-maze and the T-maze. In these tests, behavioral asymmetries are rather likely to occur, since the animals have to show several types of turns towards the left or right when ambulating through these environments. In a first study using the plus-maze, we provide detailed data on (A) the types of turns which the animals showed when changing their direction within arms (i.e., 180 degrees turns), and (B) the types of turns when proceeding from one arm to an adjacent one (i.e., 90 degrees turns). With respect to asymmetry, we found moderate biases in favor of the right. On the 1st day of plus-maze testing, there was a trend for more rightward turns within arms. On the 2nd day of testing, there was a trend for turns towards the right when alternating between arms of the plus-maze. In a 2nd study, we asked for asymmetries in the plus-maze in animals, which had been treated acutely with the psychostimulatory amphetamine analogue 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Psychostimulants drugs, especially amphetamine, have repeatedly been used before in work on functional asymmetry, since they can enhance or reveal asymmetries in normal rats. MDMA had dose-dependent effects on activity, which affected turns within arms, and turns between arms; however, there was only sparse evidence with respect to asymmetry. Interestingly, and if at all, asymmetry was in favor of the right. Finally, we present data for behavior in the T-maze, where we used a spontaneous test version, that is, the animals could explore the maze but had no task to solve. Asymmetries were measured as turns within the start arm (180 degrees), and as left- or rightward turns between arms (90 degrees ) at the T-point of the maze. In both measures, we again obtained evidence for asymmetries in favor of the right. This work supports previous studies showing that the T-maze is suitable to analyze behavioral asymmetries in rats. In addition, it provides new evidence with respect to the elevated plus-maze, indicating that this standard tool of anxiety research may also be useful in research on behavioral asymmetries and their underlying brain mechanisms. Behavioral biases in favor of the right, as shown here, have often been reported before, especially with Wistar rats. Such biases should be taken into account, since they can serve as an approach to study brain/behavior relationships, and since they may affect the outcome of physiological manipulations or behavioral trainings.
在研究正常实验大鼠的功能不对称性时,已经应用了多种行为测试并证明了其效用,包括在旋转仪或旷场中的转向、爪子使用的利手性、T 迷宫交替等。在此,我们在两项测试中分析了雄性 Wistar 大鼠,即高架十字迷宫和 T 迷宫。在这些测试中,行为不对称很可能会出现,因为动物在这些环境中行走时必须向左或向右转几种类型的弯。在第一项使用十字迷宫的研究中,我们提供了关于(A)动物在臂内改变方向时所表现出的转弯类型(即 180 度转弯),以及(B)从一个臂行进到相邻臂时的转弯类型(即 90 度转弯)的详细数据。关于不对称性,我们发现有适度偏向右侧的倾向。在十字迷宫测试的第 1 天,臂内有更多向右转弯的趋势。在测试的第 2 天,在十字迷宫的臂之间交替时,有向右转的趋势。在第二项研究中,我们研究了用精神刺激剂苯丙胺类似物 3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)急性处理的动物在十字迷宫中的不对称性。精神刺激药物,尤其是苯丙胺,以前在功能不对称研究中曾多次使用,因为它们可以增强或揭示正常大鼠的不对称性。摇头丸对活动有剂量依赖性影响,这影响了臂内转弯和臂间转弯;然而,关于不对称性的证据很少。有趣的是,即便存在不对称性,也是偏向右侧。最后,我们展示了 T 迷宫中的行为数据,我们使用的是自发测试版本,即动物可以探索迷宫但无需解决任务。不对称性通过起始臂内的转弯(180 度)以及在迷宫 T 点处臂间的向左或向右转(90 度)来测量。在这两种测量中,我们再次获得了偏向右侧的不对称性证据。这项工作支持了先前的研究,表明 T 迷宫适用于分析大鼠的行为不对称性。此外,它为高架十字迷宫提供了新的证据,表明这种焦虑研究的标准工具在行为不对称性及其潜在脑机制的研究中也可能有用。如这里所示,偏向右侧的行为偏差以前经常被报道,尤其是对于 Wistar 大鼠。应该考虑到这种偏差,因为它们可以作为研究脑/行为关系的一种方法,并且因为它们可能影响生理操作或行为训练的结果。