Tyler T R
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94720-1650, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1997;1(4):323-45. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4.
People within organized groups often internalize their feelings of obligation to obey group rules and the decisions of group authorities. They believe that group authorities and rules are legitimate and, hence, entitled to be obeyed. Because of this belief, group members voluntarily accept and obey rules and decisions from group authorities. This review draws on evidence from studies of authorities in political, legal, managerial, educational, and family settings to explore why people view as legitimate and voluntarily defer to group authorities. Two theories about legitimacy are contrasted: resource-based theories, represented by instrumental models, and identification-based theories, represented by the relational model. The findings provide strong support for the existence of a relational component of legitimacy, suggesting that authorities draw an important part of their legitimacy from their social relationship with group members. The findings also show that there is an instrumental component to legitimacy. Hence, the psychology of legitimacy involves both instrumental and relational elements.
有组织群体中的人们常常将遵守群体规则和群体权威决策的义务感内化。他们认为群体权威和规则是合法的,因此有权得到遵守。基于这种信念,群体成员自愿接受并服从群体权威的规则和决策。本综述借鉴了对政治、法律、管理、教育和家庭环境中权威的研究证据,以探讨人们为何将群体权威视为合法并自愿服从。对比了两种关于合法性的理论:以工具模型为代表的基于资源的理论和以关系模型为代表的基于认同的理论。研究结果为合法性的关系成分的存在提供了有力支持,表明权威的合法性很大一部分来自于他们与群体成员的社会关系。研究结果还表明合法性存在工具性成分。因此,合法性的心理既涉及工具性要素,也涉及关系性要素。