Wintermark Max, Fischbein Nancy J, Smith Wade S, Ko Nerissa U, Quist Marcel, Dillon William P
Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Jan;26(1):104-12.
Dynamic perfusion CT (PCT) with deconvolution produces maps of time-to-peak (TTP), mean transit time (MTT), regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV), with a computerized automated map of the infarct and penumbra. We determined the accuracy of these maps in patients with suspected acute hemispheric stroke.
Forty-six patients underwent nonenhanced CT and dynamic PCT, with follow-up CT or MR imaging. Two observers reviewed the nonenhanced studies for signs of stroke and read the PCT maps for TTP, MTT, rCBF, and rCBV abnormalities. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement were compared (Wilcoxon tests). Nonenhanced CT and PCT data were reviewed for stroke extent according to previously reported methods. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the computerized maps in detecting ischemia and its extent were determined.
Compared with nonenhanced CT, PCT maps were significantly more accurate in detecting stroke (75.7-86.0% vs. 66.2%; P <.01), MTT maps were significantly more sensitive (77.6% vs. 69.2%; P <.01), and rCBF and rCBV maps were significantly more specific (90.9% and 92.7%, respectively, vs. 65.0%; P <.01). Regarding stroke extent, PCT maps were significantly more sensitive than nonenhanced CT (up to 94.4% vs. 42.9%; P <.01) and had higher interobserver agreement (up to 0.763). For the computerized map, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, were 68.2%, 92.3%, and 88.1% in detecting ischemia and 72.2%, 91.8%, and 87.9% in showing the extent.
Dynamic PCT maps are more accurate than nonenhanced CT in detecting hemispheric strokes. Despite limited spatial coverage, PCT is highly reliable to assess the stroke extent.
采用去卷积的动态灌注CT(PCT)可生成达峰时间(TTP)、平均通过时间(MTT)、局部脑血流量(rCBF)和局部脑血容量(rCBV)图,以及梗死灶和半暗带的计算机自动图。我们确定了这些图在疑似急性半球性卒中患者中的准确性。
46例患者接受了非增强CT和动态PCT检查,并进行了随访CT或磁共振成像。两名观察者对非增强研究进行卒中征象检查,并阅读PCT图以观察TTP、MTT、rCBF和rCBV异常情况。比较了敏感性、特异性、准确性和观察者间一致性(Wilcoxon检验)。根据先前报道的方法,对非增强CT和PCT数据进行卒中范围评估。确定了计算机自动图在检测缺血及其范围方面的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
与非增强CT相比,PCT图在检测卒中方面显著更准确(75.7 - 86.0%对66.2%;P <.01),MTT图显著更敏感(77.6%对69.2%;P <.01),rCBF和rCBV图显著更具特异性(分别为90.9%和92.7%对65.0%;P <.01)。关于卒中范围,PCT图比非增强CT显著更敏感(高达94.4%对42.9%;P <.01),且观察者间一致性更高(高达0.763)。对于计算机自动图,检测缺血时的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为68.2%、92.3%和88.1%,显示范围时分别为72.2%、91.8%和87.9%。
动态PCT图在检测半球性卒中方面比非增强CT更准确。尽管空间覆盖有限,但PCT在评估卒中范围方面高度可靠。