Hurley K F, Brown-Maher T, Campbell S G, Wallace T, Venugopal R, Baggs D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Emerg Med J. 2005 Feb;22(2):97-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.002626.
Universal screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) in the emergency department (ED) has been advocated by many medical institutions. Policies implemented for IPV screening have met with numerous obstacles. One such obstacle is the perception by emergency personnel that patients might be offended by such screening if they presented to the ED for problems unrelated to trauma.
To assess opinions of adult ED patients regarding a policy of universal IPV screening for women presenting to the ED.
This study was conducted in EDs in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and St John's, Newfoundland. Patients were questioned as to whether it was appropriate for all women to be asked if they had experienced violent or threatening behaviour from someone close to them. Patients in significant pain or in extremis were not approached.
The data consist of a convenience sample of 514 adult ED patients, aged 16-95 years. Two (0.4%) were excluded from the analysis. Of 512 analysed, 442 (86.0%) answered "yes" to the question, 53 (10.3%) answered "no", 17 (3.3%) had no opinion. There were no significant differences between the proportion of "yes" and "no" answers in the male and female groups.
Universal screening for IPV of adult female patients presenting to the ED was supported by most patients. Patient objections should not be seen as a reason to withhold questioning on this issue.
许多医疗机构主张在急诊科(ED)对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)进行普遍筛查。为IPV筛查实施的政策遇到了诸多障碍。其中一个障碍是急救人员认为,如果患者因与创伤无关的问题前往急诊科,他们可能会因这种筛查而感到被冒犯。
评估成年急诊科患者对向急诊科就诊的女性进行普遍IPV筛查政策的看法。
本研究在新斯科舍省哈利法克斯市和纽芬兰圣约翰市的急诊科进行。询问患者是否适合询问所有女性是否曾遭受亲近之人的暴力或威胁行为。未接触处于剧痛或危急状态的患者。
数据包括514名年龄在16 - 95岁的成年急诊科患者的便利样本。两名(0.4%)被排除在分析之外。在512名被分析的患者中,442名(86.0%)对该问题回答“是”,53名(10.3%)回答“否”,17名(3.3%)没有意见。男性和女性组中回答“是”和“否”的比例没有显著差异。
大多数患者支持对到急诊科就诊的成年女性患者进行IPV普遍筛查。不应将患者的反对意见视为在此问题上不进行询问的理由。