Suppr超能文献

曲美他嗪在心绞痛联合治疗中的应用——TACT研究:一项随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,比较曲美他嗪与常规治疗对稳定型心绞痛患者的疗效

Trimetazidine in Angina Combination Therapy--the TACT study: trimetazidine versus conventional treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

作者信息

Chazov E I, Lepakchin V K, Zharova E A, Fitilev S B, Levin A M, Rumiantzeva E G, Fitileva T B

机构信息

Russian Cardiology Research Complex, 3rd Cherepkovskaya 15a, 121552 Moscow, Russian Federation.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):35-42. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200501000-00006.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of trimetazidine (TMZ) in combination with hemodynamic agents (beta-blockers or long-acting nitrates) in 177 stable angina patients. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study (TACT: Trimetazidine in Angina Combination Therapy), stable angina patients resistant to nitrates or beta-blockers were selected. After a 1-week selection period (W0), patients who had a difference of <10% in duration between 2 positive exercise tests, defined as 1-mm ST-segment depression (STD) 80 milliseconds after J point with angina pain or 1.5 mm without pain were randomly treated with TMZ (20 mg t.i.d., n = 90) or placebo (Pbo t.i.d., n = 87) orally. A final exercise test was performed after 12 weeks of treatment (W12). The efficacy was assessed by exercise test duration, time to 1-mm STD, time to angina onset, mean number of angina attacks, mean short-acting nitrate consumption, and rate-pressure product. Differences (W12 - W0) in these parameters were analyzed using the Student t test. All statistical tests were conducted at the 5% significance level. At inclusion and during the study, 52% of patients received long-acting nitrates, and 48% were treated with a beta-blocker as monotherapy. At the beginning of the study, the TMZ and Pbo groups were statistically homogeneous with respect to all analyzed characteristics (demographic characteristics, characteristics of anamnesis, characteristics used for evaluation of antianginal therapy efficacy). For various reasons, 11 patients (7 from the Pbo group and 4 from the TMZ group) were excluded from the trial. A total of 166 patients (80 from the Pbo group and 86 from the TMZ group) completed the study in full compliance with the protocol. After 12 weeks of therapy, exercise test duration increased from 417.7 +/- 14.2 (W0) to 506.8 +/- 17.7 seconds (W12) in the TMZ group versus 435.3 +/- 14.8 (W0) to 458.9 +/- 16.2 seconds (W12) in the Pbo group (P < 0.05). Time to 1-mm STD increased from 389.0 +/- 15.3 (W0) to 479.6 +/- 18.6 seconds (W12) in the TMZ group versus 411.8 +/- 15.2 (W0) to 428.5 +/- 17.3 seconds (W12) in the Pbo group (P < 0.05). Time to onset of anginal pain increased from 417.0 +/- 16.9 (W0) to 517.3 +/- 21.0 seconds (W12) in the TMZ group versus 415.1 +/- 16.5 (W0) to 436.4 +/- 18.5 seconds (W12) in the Pbo group (P < 0.005). The mean number of anginal attacks per week decreased from 5.6 +/- 0.6 to 2.7 +/- 0.5 in the TMZ group versus 6.8 +/- 0.7 to 5.1 +/- 0.7 in the Pbo group (P < 0.05), mean consumption short-acting nitrates per week decreased from 5.2 +/- 0.9 to 2.8 +/- 0.8 in the TMZ group versus 5.5 +/- 0.8 to 4.1 +/- 0.9 in the Pbo group (NS). No change in the rate-pressure product was seen in both. The combination of trimetazidine with beta-blockers or long-acting nitrates significantly improves exercise stress test parameters and angina symptoms compared with placebo. Due to its metabolic effect, free of any hemodynamic action, trimetazidine has proven to be beneficial for combination in patients with stable angina.

摘要

本研究旨在评估曲美他嗪(TMZ)联合血流动力学药物(β受体阻滞剂或长效硝酸盐)对177例稳定型心绞痛患者的疗效及可接受性。在这项随机、安慰剂对照研究(TACT:曲美他嗪联合心绞痛治疗)中,选取了对硝酸盐或β受体阻滞剂耐药的稳定型心绞痛患者。在为期1周的筛选期(W0)后,对于两次阳性运动试验持续时间差异<10%的患者(定义为J点后80毫秒出现1毫米ST段压低(STD)伴心绞痛或无疼痛时为1.5毫米),随机给予TMZ(20毫克,每日3次,n = 90)或安慰剂(每日3次,n = 87)口服。治疗12周后(W12)进行最终运动试验。通过运动试验持续时间、达到1毫米STD的时间、心绞痛发作时间、心绞痛发作平均次数、短效硝酸盐平均消耗量以及心率血压乘积来评估疗效。使用学生t检验分析这些参数的差异(W12 - W0)。所有统计检验均在5%的显著性水平进行。纳入研究时及研究期间,52%的患者接受长效硝酸盐治疗,48%的患者接受β受体阻滞剂单药治疗。研究开始时,TMZ组和安慰剂组在所有分析特征(人口统计学特征、病史特征、用于评估抗心绞痛治疗疗效的特征)方面在统计学上具有同质性。由于各种原因,11例患者(安慰剂组7例,TMZ组4例)被排除在试验之外。共有166例患者(安慰剂组80例,TMZ组86例)完全按照方案完成了研究。治疗12周后,TMZ组运动试验持续时间从417.7±14.2秒(W0)增加到506.8±17.7秒(W12),而安慰剂组从435.3±14.8秒(W0)增加到458.9±16.2秒(W12)(P < 0.05)。TMZ组达到1毫米STD的时间从389.0±15.3秒(W0)增加到479.6±18.6秒(W12),而安慰剂组从411.8±15.2秒(W0)增加到428.5±17.3秒(W12)(P < 0.05)。TMZ组心绞痛发作时间从417.0±16.9秒(W0)增加到517.3±21.0秒(W12),而安慰剂组从415.1±16.5秒(W0)增加到436.4±18.5秒(W12)(P < 0.005)。TMZ组每周心绞痛发作平均次数从5.6±0.6次降至2.7±0.5次,而安慰剂组从6.8±0.7次降至5.1±0.7次(P < 0.05),TMZ组每周短效硝酸盐平均消耗量从5.2±0.9降至2.8±0.8,而安慰剂组从5.5±0.8降至4.1±0.9(无统计学意义)。两组心率血压乘积均无变化。与安慰剂相比,曲美他嗪联合β受体阻滞剂或长效硝酸盐可显著改善运动应激试验参数及心绞痛症状。由于其代谢作用,无任何血流动力学作用,曲美他嗪已被证明对稳定型心绞痛患者联合用药有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验