Jeffcoate W J, van Houtum W H
Foot Ulcer Trials Unit, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Diabetologia. 2004 Dec;47(12):2051-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1584-3. Epub 2004 Dec 11.
Strategic targets for the management of foot ulcers focus on reducing the incidence of amputation. While data on the incidence of amputation can be obtained relatively easily, the figures require very careful interpretation. Variation in the definition of amputation, population selection and the choice of numerator and denominator make comparisons difficult. Major and minor amputation have to be distinguished as they are undertaken for different reasons and are associated with different costs and functional implications. Many factors influence the decision of whether or not to remove a limb. In addition to disease severity, co-morbidities, and social and individual patient factors, many aspects of the structure of care services affect this decision, including access to primary care, quality of primary care, delays in referral, availability and quality of specialist resources, and prevailing medical opinion. It follows that a high incidence of amputation can reflect a higher disease prevalence, late referral, limited resources, or a particularly interventionist approach by a specialist team. Conversely, a low incidence of amputation can indicate a lower disease prevalence or severity, good management of diabetes in primary and secondary care, or a particularly conservative approach by an expert team. An inappropriately conservative approach could conceivably enhance suffering by condemning a person to months of incapacity before they die with an unhealed ulcer. The reported annual incidence of major amputation in industrialised countries ranges from 0.06 to 3.83 per 10(3) people at risk. Some centres have documented that the incidence is falling, but this is often from a baseline value that was unusually high. Other centres have reported that the incidence has not changed. The ultimate target is to achieve not only a decrease in incidence, but also a low overall incidence. This must be accompanied by improvements in morbidity, mortality, and patient function and mood.
足部溃疡管理的战略目标侧重于降低截肢发生率。虽然截肢发生率的数据相对容易获取,但这些数字需要非常谨慎地解读。截肢定义、人群选择以及分子和分母的选择存在差异,使得比较变得困难。必须区分大截肢和小截肢,因为它们的实施原因不同,且与不同的成本和功能影响相关。许多因素会影响是否进行肢体切除的决定。除了疾病严重程度、合并症以及社会和个体患者因素外,护理服务结构的许多方面也会影响这一决定,包括获得初级护理的机会、初级护理质量、转诊延迟、专科资源的可用性和质量以及主流医学观点。因此,高截肢发生率可能反映出疾病患病率较高、转诊延迟、资源有限或专科团队采取了特别积极的干预措施。相反,低截肢发生率可能表明疾病患病率或严重程度较低、初级和二级护理中糖尿病管理良好或专家团队采取了特别保守的方法。一种不恰当的保守方法可能会让人在未愈合的溃疡中痛苦数月后死亡,从而加重痛苦。工业化国家报告的每年大截肢发生率为每1000名有风险的人中0.06至3.83例。一些中心记录到发生率在下降,但这往往是从异常高的基线值开始下降的。其他中心报告发生率没有变化。最终目标不仅是实现发生率的降低,而且是实现总体发生率较低。这必须伴随着发病率、死亡率以及患者功能和情绪的改善。