Wang Li-Qun, Ye Xiao-Chuan, Deng Fen, Zhang Li-Ping, Xiao He-Xiang
New Drugs Research and Development Center, Hubei Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430074, China.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2004 Dec;26(6):608-10.
To evaluate the quality difference between Coptis chinensis planted with ecological techniques and shelf planted Coptis chinensis.
Ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, alcohol extract mensuration, moisture mensuration, and ash mensuration were used to determine the contents of total alkaloids, alcohol extract, water, and total ash of Coptis chinensis, which were planted in shelf, Rhus chinensis wood, M mulbery wood, corn wood, Magnolia officinalis wood, fruiter wood, shading net, and firry wood, respectively.
The contents of total alkaloids and alcohol extract of Coptis chinensis Table planted with ecological techniques were higher than those of Coptis chinensis planted in shelf. The contents of water and total ash were less than 12% and 5%, respectively, which met the provisions of the pharmacopoeia.
The quality of Coptis chinensis planted with ecological techniques is similar to that of Coptis chinensis planted in shelf. These ecological techniques for Coptis chinensis have become mature and practical.
评价采用生态种植技术种植的黄连与架棚种植黄连的质量差异。
采用紫外 - 可见分光光度法、醇溶性浸出物测定法、水分测定法和灰分测定法,分别测定架棚、盐肤木林、桑树林、玉米林、厚朴林、果园、遮阳网和杉木林种植的黄连中总生物碱、醇溶性浸出物、水分和总灰分的含量。
采用生态种植技术种植的黄连总生物碱和醇溶性浸出物含量高于架棚种植的黄连。水分和总灰分含量分别低于12%和5%,符合药典规定。
采用生态种植技术种植的黄连质量与架棚种植的黄连相似。这些黄连生态种植技术已成熟且实用。