Garside Ruth, Stein Ken, Wyatt Katrina, Round Ali
Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, UK.
BJOG. 2005 Jan;112(1):12-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00449.x.
To compare the effectiveness of two second generation endometrial ablation techniques (microwave and thermal balloon endometrial ablation) with first generation techniques of endometrial ablation to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in women.
We searched the Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2002), the National Research Register, MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002), Embase (1980 to August 2002) and Web of Science Proceedings (all years). We also searched reference lists and contacted experts and manufacturers in the field.
Randomised controlled trials and controlled trials of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation versus transcervical resection and rollerball ablation, alone or in combination, to treat heavy menstrual bleeding were included.
Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. As there was considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies, meta-analysis was not undertaken and results are presented descriptively.
Two randomised controlled trials of microwave endometrial ablation and eight trials (six randomised controlled trials) of thermal balloon endometrial ablation were included in the review. No significant differences were found between first and second generation techniques in terms of amenorrhoea, bleeding patterns, pre-menstrual symptoms, patient satisfaction or quality of life. Microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation had significantly shorter operating and theatre times than first generation techniques. Adverse effects were few with all techniques, but there were fewer peri-operative adverse effects with second generation techniques.
Microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation are alternatives to first generation techniques for treating heavy menstrual bleeding. No head-to-head trials of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation have been undertaken and there is not yet enough evidence of differences in clinical effectiveness between these two techniques.
比较两种第二代子宫内膜去除技术(微波和热球囊子宫内膜去除术)与第一代子宫内膜去除技术治疗女性月经过多的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane图书馆(2002年第3期)、国家研究注册库、MEDLINE(1966年至2002年8月)、Embase(1980年至2002年8月)和科学网会议录(所有年份)。我们还检索了参考文献列表并联系了该领域的专家和制造商。
纳入微波子宫内膜去除术和热球囊子宫内膜去除术与经宫颈切除术和滚球消融术单独或联合治疗月经过多的随机对照试验和对照试验。
两名评价员独立选择纳入研究并提取数据。由于各研究之间存在相当大的临床和方法学异质性,未进行荟萃分析,结果采用描述性呈现。
本综述纳入了两项微波子宫内膜去除术的随机对照试验和八项热球囊子宫内膜去除术的试验(六项随机对照试验)。在闭经、出血模式、经前症状、患者满意度或生活质量方面,第一代和第二代技术之间未发现显著差异。微波子宫内膜去除术和热球囊子宫内膜去除术的手术时间和手术室停留时间明显短于第一代技术。所有技术的不良反应均较少,但第二代技术的围手术期不良反应较少。
微波子宫内膜去除术和热球囊子宫内膜去除术是治疗月经过多的第一代技术的替代方法。尚未对微波子宫内膜去除术和热球囊子宫内膜去除术进行直接比较试验,目前尚无足够证据表明这两种技术在临床有效性上存在差异。