Rinaldi Sabina, Kaaks Rudolf, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Anne, Arslan Alan A, Shore Roy E, Koenig Karen L, Dossus Laure, Riboli Elio, Stattin Pär, Lukanova Annekatrin, Toniolo Paolo
Nutrition and Hormones Group, IARC, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jan;14(1):48-52.
Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and its major binding protein IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) have been associated with increased risk of premenopausal breast cancer, although risk estimates varied broadly. An extension of a case-control study (138 cases, 259 matched controls) on IGF-I and breast cancer in premenopausal women nested in the New York University Women's Health Study cohort offered the opportunity to address the hypothesis that such variability may have been the result of variations in the ability of different IGFBP-3 assays to specifically measure intact/functional forms of the protein. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 had originally been measured using in-house RIAs. These measurements were repeated using commercially available ELISAs [Diagnostic System Laboratories (DSL), Webster, Texas], and a third ELISA with greater specificity for active forms for IGFBP-3. Pearson's correlations between IGF-I concentrations in the original study and DSL ELISA were very high [r = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94]. Correlations with DSL ELISA were much lower for IGFBP-3 (r = 0.58; 0.49-0.66) and even lower still with the assay for functional IGFBP-3 (r = 0.33; 0.20-0.44). IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements by the DSL ELISA methods showed statistically significant relationships with risk. The odds ratios (OR) for top versus bottom quartiles were 1.93 (1.00-3.72; P = 0.02) and 2.03 (1.09-3.76; P = 0.02), respectively, in agreement with the original observations. In contrast, measurements of functional IGFBP-3 tended to be unrelated to risk [ORs for the top versus bottom quartile, 0.97 (0.44-2.11)]. The association with IGF-I became substantially weaker and lost statistical significance after adjustment for IGFBP-3 using DSL ELISA, but became considerably stronger when adjusting for the functional IGFBP-3 measurements [OR = 2.43 (1.21-4.90); P = 0.005], or when considering the molar ratio of IGF-I to IGFBP-3 [OR = 2.37 (1.13-5.00); P = 0.02]. These results are consistent with an association of breast cancer risk in young women with elevated IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and show that for IGFBP-3, the strength of such an association could vary substantially depending on the assay used.
循环胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I)及其主要结合蛋白胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-3(IGFBP-3)与绝经前乳腺癌风险增加相关,尽管风险估计差异很大。纽约大学女性健康研究队列中的一项关于绝经前女性IGF-I与乳腺癌的病例对照研究(138例病例,259例匹配对照)的扩展研究,为验证以下假设提供了机会:这种变异性可能是由于不同IGFBP-3检测方法特异性测量该蛋白完整/功能形式的能力存在差异所致。IGF-I和IGFBP-3最初使用内部放射免疫分析法(RIA)进行测量。这些测量结果使用市售酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)[诊断系统实验室(DSL),得克萨斯州韦伯斯特]重复进行,以及第三种对IGFBP-3活性形式具有更高特异性的ELISA法。原始研究中IGF-I浓度与DSL ELISA法之间的皮尔逊相关性非常高[r = 0.92;95%置信区间(CI),0.90 - 0.94]。IGFBP-3与DSL ELISA法的相关性则低得多(r = 0.58;0.49 - 0.66),与功能性IGFBP-3检测法的相关性更低(r = 0.33;0.20 - 0.44)。通过DSL ELISA法测量的IGF-I和IGFBP-3与风险呈统计学显著关系。最高四分位数与最低四分位数的比值比(OR)分别为1.93(1.00 - 3.72;P = 0.02)和2.03(1.09 - 3.76;P = 0.02),与原始观察结果一致。相比之下,功能性IGFBP-3的测量结果往往与风险无关[最高四分位数与最低四分位数的OR为0.97(0.44 - 2.11)]。使用DSL ELISA法对IGFBP-3进行校正后,与IGF-I的关联显著减弱且失去统计学意义,但在对功能性IGFBP-3测量值进行校正时,关联显著增强[OR = 2.43(1.21 - 4.90);P = 0.005],或者在考虑IGF-I与IGFBP-3的摩尔比时也是如此[OR = 2.37(1.13 - 5.00);P = 0.02]。这些结果与年轻女性乳腺癌风险与IGF-I和IGFBP-3升高之间的关联一致,并表明对于IGFBP-3,这种关联的强度可能因所使用的检测方法而有很大差异。