Meyer Philipp T, Elmenhorst David, Bier Dirk, Holschbach Marcus H, Matusch Andreas, Coenen Heinz H, Zilles Karl, Bauer Andreas
Institute of Medicine, Molecular Neuroimaging, Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-Str., 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1192-204. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.029. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
The cerebral A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1)AR) has recently become accessible for in vivo imaging using the selective A(1)AR ligand [(18)F]CPFPX and PET. For broad application in neurosciences, imaging at distribution equilibrium is advantageous to quantify stimulus-dependent changes in receptor availability and to avoid arterial blood sampling. Here we propose a bolus/infusion (B/I) protocol to assess the total distribution volume (DV(t)) of [(18)F]CPFPX under equilibrium conditions. Employing a bolus-to-infusion ratio of 0.8 h, (near) equilibrium conditions were attained within 60 min. The regional DV(t)' given by arterial and venous equilibrium analyses agreed well with conventional two-tissue compartment model analyses (r(2) > 0.94 and r(2) > 0.84, respectively) and Logan's graphical analyses (r(2) = 1.0 and r(2) > 0.93, respectively) (n = 4 healthy volunteers). The mean regional DV(t)' values of these equilibrium analyses and of venous equilibrium analyses in additional seven volunteers demonstrated excellent agreement with the results of earlier bolus studies (r(2) > 0.98). Error simulations show that minor deviations from true equilibrium are associated with negligible to small DV(t) errors. In conclusion, [(18)F]CPFPX shows suitable characteristics for A(1)AR quantification by B/I PET scanning. Carefully standardized venous equilibrium analyses may substitute arterial analyses and thus considerably enhance applicability of A(1)AR PET in clinical routine.
脑A(1)型腺苷受体(A(1)AR)最近可以通过使用选择性A(1)AR配体[(18)F]CPFPX和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行体内成像。为了在神经科学中广泛应用,在分布平衡状态下成像有利于量化受体可用性的刺激依赖性变化,并避免动脉血采样。在此,我们提出一种团注/输注(B/I)方案,以评估[(18)F]CPFPX在平衡条件下的总分布容积(DV(t))。采用0.8小时的团注与输注比,在60分钟内达到(接近)平衡状态。通过动脉和静脉平衡分析得出的区域DV(t)'与传统的双组织室模型分析(分别为r(2)>0.94和r(2)>0.84)以及洛根图形分析(分别为r(2)=1.0和r(2)>0.93)结果吻合良好(n = 4名健康志愿者)。在另外7名志愿者中,这些平衡分析和静脉平衡分析的平均区域DV(t)'值与早期团注研究结果显示出极佳的一致性(r(2)>0.98)。误差模拟表明,与真实平衡的微小偏差所导致的DV(t)误差可忽略不计或很小。总之,[(18)F]CPFPX显示出通过B/I PET扫描对A(1)AR进行定量的合适特性。精心标准化的静脉平衡分析可以替代动脉分析,从而大大提高A(1)AR PET在临床常规中的适用性。