Brody Howard
Department of Family Practice and Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):82-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.259.
Whether physicians ought to interact with pharmaceutical sales representatives (reps) is a question worthy of careful ethical analysis. The issue presents a challenge to both professional integrity and time management. Empirical data suggest that interactions with pharmaceutical reps increase the chances that the physician will act contrary to duties owed to the patient. Ideally, a physician might both interact with reps and also do the research necessary to counteract the commercial bias in their messages. But a physician who actually did that research would, in turn, be devoting a good deal of time that might better be spent in other activities. The counterargument, that one is obligated to see representatives to obtain free samples to best serve one's patients, can be shown in most practice settings not to be compelling. Physicians ought to refuse to visit with representatives as a matter of both professional integrity and sensible time management.
医生是否应该与医药销售代表互动是一个值得进行仔细伦理分析的问题。这个问题对职业操守和时间管理都构成了挑战。实证数据表明,与医药销售代表的互动增加了医生做出违背对患者所负职责行为的可能性。理想情况下,医生或许既能与销售代表互动,又能开展必要的研究以抵消他们信息中的商业偏见。但实际上进行该项研究的医生,反过来又会投入大量时间,而这些时间或许用于其他活动会更好。那种认为有义务会见销售代表以获取免费样品从而更好地服务患者的反驳观点,在大多数实际情况下并不具有说服力。出于职业操守和合理的时间管理考虑,医生应该拒绝与销售代表会面。