Steller Michael D, Shaw Tanya J, Vanderhyden Barbara C, Ethier Jean-François
Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Third Floor, 503 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 1C4.
Mol Cancer Res. 2005 Jan;3(1):50-61.
Malignant ovarian epithelial tumors have been shown to have decreased inhibin production relative to activin production compared with normal ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells and nonmalignant ovarian tumors. Activin stimulates proliferation of many ovarian cancer cell lines. Inhibin antagonizes the action of activin, and inhibin-deficient mice develop gonadal tumors, suggesting that inhibin may be a tumor suppressor. However, its effects on OSE and ovarian cancer cells are unknown. We hypothesize that activin and inhibin are important regulators of biological activity in ovarian cancers. We found that inhibin A decreased murine OSE proliferation, whereas activin A had no effect. Activin A increased the proliferation of four of eight ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3, OCC1, OVCAR3, and A2780-s). Inhibin A decreased the proliferation of SKOV3, A2780-s, and OVCAR3 but had no effect on OCC1, ES-2, HEY, A2780-cp, and OVCA429 cells. When injected into nude mice, the inhibin-resistant cancer cell lines resulted in shorter survival time compared with the inhibin-responsive cells. Further investigations on SKOV3 and OCC1 cells showed that activin A increased invasion through Matrigel. Inhibin A decreased both basal and activin-induced proliferation and invasion of SKOV3 but had no effect on OCC1 cells. Reverse transcription-PCR analyses showed that the SKOV3 and OCC1 cells produced activin, but only SKOV3 produced inhibin. Analysis of the activin/inhibin signaling pathways indicated that Smad anchor for receptor activation was elevated in SKOV3 and OCC1 cells and that an up-regulation of the activin receptor expression may explain the inhibin resistance of OCC1 cells. Our results suggest that activin responsiveness may be gained during transformation of OSE cells and that inhibin resistance may contribute to the aggressive behavior of ovarian cancer cells.
与正常卵巢表面上皮(OSE)细胞和非恶性卵巢肿瘤相比,恶性卵巢上皮肿瘤已被证明相对于激活素的产生,抑制素的产生减少。激活素可刺激多种卵巢癌细胞系的增殖。抑制素可拮抗激活素的作用,且抑制素缺陷型小鼠会发生性腺肿瘤,这表明抑制素可能是一种肿瘤抑制因子。然而,其对OSE和卵巢癌细胞的影响尚不清楚。我们推测激活素和抑制素是卵巢癌生物活性的重要调节因子。我们发现抑制素A可降低小鼠OSE的增殖,而激活素A则无此作用。激活素A可增加8种卵巢癌细胞系中的4种(SKOV3、OCC1、OVCAR3和A2780-s)的增殖。抑制素A可降低SKOV3、A2780-s和OVCAR3的增殖,但对OCC1、ES-2、HEY、A2780-cp和OVCA429细胞无影响。当注射到裸鼠体内时,与对抑制素敏感的细胞相比,对抑制素耐药的癌细胞系导致的存活时间更短。对SKOV3和OCC1细胞的进一步研究表明,激活素A可增加穿过基质胶的侵袭能力。抑制素A可降低SKOV3的基础增殖以及激活素诱导的增殖和侵袭,但对OCC1细胞无影响。逆转录-聚合酶链反应分析表明,SKOV3和OCC1细胞可产生激活素,但只有SKOV3产生抑制素。对激活素/抑制素信号通路的分析表明,受体激活的Smad锚定蛋白在SKOV3和OCC1细胞中升高,激活素受体表达的上调可能解释了OCC1细胞对抑制素的耐药性。我们的结果表明,在OSE细胞转化过程中可能获得了对激活素的反应性,而对抑制素的耐药性可能导致卵巢癌细胞的侵袭性行为。