Bond Gary R, Salyers Michelle P, Rollins Angela L, Rapp Charles A, Zipple Anthony M
Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford St., LD 124, Indianapolis, IN 46202-3275, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2004 Dec;40(6):569-88. doi: 10.1007/s10597-004-6130-8.
Since the groundbreaking work of the Robert Wood Johnson Conference in 1998 identifying six evidence-based practices (EBPs) for people with severe mental illness (SMI), the mental health field has moved in the direction of re-examination and redesign of service systems. Surprisingly, one area that has not been fully explicated is the role that EBPs play in promoting community integration. In this paper, we explain how community integration is a unifying concept providing direction and vision for community mental health for people with SMI. As one crucial aspect of the recovery process, community integration clarifies the link between EBPs and recovery. We propose an alternate view, grounded in the empirical literature, to the assertion by Anthony, Rogers, and Farkas [2003, Community Mental Health Journal, 39, 101-114] that "EBP research has rarely demonstrated a positive impact on recovery related outcomes."
自1998年罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊会议开展开创性工作,确定了针对严重精神疾病患者的六种循证实践方法以来,心理健康领域已朝着重新审视和重新设计服务系统的方向发展。令人惊讶的是,有一个领域尚未得到充分阐释,即循证实践方法在促进社区融合方面所起的作用。在本文中,我们解释了社区融合是一个统一的概念,为严重精神疾病患者的社区心理健康提供方向和愿景。作为康复过程的一个关键方面,社区融合阐明了循证实践方法与康复之间的联系。我们基于实证文献,对安东尼、罗杰斯和法卡斯[2003年,《社区心理健康杂志》,第39卷,第101 - 114页]提出的“循证实践研究很少证明对与康复相关的结果有积极影响”这一观点提出了另一种看法。