Rabadi Meheroz H, Blau Alan
Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Mar;19(1):20-6. doi: 10.1177/1545968304272762.
Poststroke functional outcome and discharge disposition are influenced by age, lesion location and size, severity of neurological insult, prior functional ability, and social support. The effect of admission ambulation velocity on length of stay and discharge disposition has not been previously reported.
Prospective, cohort study.
Designated acute stroke rehabilitation unit.
373 patients consecutively admitted to a designated inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit were studied. The study sample was divided into 2 groups, based on admission ambulation velocity (meters/second) during a 2-min timed walk test. Fast ambulators had an ambulation velocity of greater than 0.15 m/s, whereas slow ambulators had an ambulation velocity of 0.15 m/s or less, and also included nonambulators.
None.
Primary outcome measures were length of stay and discharge disposition. Secondary outcome measures were change in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and change in ambulation velocity per week. Continuous, ordinal, and nominal variables were analyzed using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values assessed admission ambulation velocity as a predictor of discharge disposition.
Patient variables for slow ambulators (n = 226) versus fast ambulators (n = 147) were as follows: age (68 +/- 13 SD vs. 69 +/- 12, P = 0.32), male-female ratio (100:126 vs. 78:69, P = 0.09), admission total FIM score (52 +/- 17 vs. 77 +/- 16, P < 0.0001), change in total FIM score (20 +/- 12 vs. 16 +/- 12, P < 0.003), change in ambulation velocity per week (0.05 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.30, P < 0.0001), length of stay in days (30 +/- 28 vs. 17 +/- 19, P < 0.0001), and discharge disposition: home/skilled nursing facility (133/91 vs. 133/13, P < 0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (based on chi-square analyses) for admission fast ambulators as a predictor of home discharge were 0.5, 0.87, 0.91, and 0.41, respectively. Admission ambulation velocity alone correctly identified discharge disposition in 78% of the patient population, based on logistic regression analysis (P < 0.0001).
Admission ambulation velocity can predict length of stay and discharge disposition poststroke. This effect is independent of age and admission total FIM score.
中风后的功能结局及出院安排受年龄、病灶位置与大小、神经损伤严重程度、既往功能能力及社会支持等因素影响。入院时的步行速度对住院时间及出院安排的影响此前尚无报道。
前瞻性队列研究。
指定的急性中风康复单元。
对连续入住指定住院中风康复单元的373例患者进行研究。根据2分钟定时步行测试时的入院步行速度(米/秒),将研究样本分为2组。快速步行者的步行速度大于0.15米/秒,而慢速步行者的步行速度为0.15米/秒或更低,还包括非步行者。
无。
主要结局指标为住院时间及出院安排。次要结局指标为功能独立性测量(FIM)评分的变化及每周步行速度的变化。连续变量、有序变量和名义变量分别采用学生t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和卡方检验进行分析。评估入院步行速度作为出院安排预测指标的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。
慢速步行者(n = 226)与快速步行者(n = 147)的患者变量如下:年龄(68±13标准差 vs. 69±12,P = 0.32),男女比例(100:126 vs. 78:69,P = 0.09),入院时FIM总分(52±17 vs. 77±16,P < 0.0001),FIM总分变化(20±12 vs. 16±12,P < 0.003), 每周步行速度变化(0.05±0.06 vs. 0.13±0.30,P < 0.0001),住院天数(30±28 vs. 17±19,P < 0.0001),以及出院安排:回家/熟练护理机构(133/91 vs. 133/13,P < 0.0001)。入院快速步行者作为出院回家预测指标的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值(基于卡方分析)分别为0.5、0.87、0.91和0.41。根据逻辑回归分析,仅入院步行速度就能正确识别78%患者的出院安排(P < 0.0001)。
入院步行速度可预测中风后的住院时间及出院安排。这一影响独立于年龄及入院时FIM总分。