Suppr超能文献

在接受整形手术的患者中,作为昂丹司琼辅助用药的抗呕吐预防听觉刺激的最佳时机。

Optimal timing of acustimulation for antiemetic prophylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery.

作者信息

White Paul F, Hamza Mohamed A, Recart Alejandro, Coleman Jayne E, Macaluso Amy R, Cox Lyndsey, Jaffer Omar, Song Dajun, Rohrich Rod

机构信息

Departments of *Anesthesiology & Pain Management and †Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):367-372. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144425.16116.0A.

Abstract

We designed this study to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in combination with ondansetron when applied before, after, or both before and after plastic surgery. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design was used to compare three prophylactic acustimulation treatment schedules: preoperative--an active device was applied for 30 min before and a sham device for 72 h after surgery; postoperative--a sham device was applied for 30 min before and an active device for 72 h after surgery; and perioperative--an active device was applied for 30 min before and 72 h after surgery (n = 35 per group). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic, and ondansetron 4 mg IV was administered at the end of surgery. The incidence of vomiting/retching and the need for rescue antiemetics were determined at specific time intervals for up to 72 h after surgery. Nausea scores were recorded with an 11-point verbal rating scale. Other outcome variables assessed included discharge times (for outpatients), resumption of normal activities of daily living, complete antiemetic response rate, and patient satisfaction with antiemetic therapy and quality of recovery. Perioperative use of the ReliefBand significantly increased complete responses (68%) compared with use of the device before surgery only (43%). Median postoperative nausea scores were significantly reduced in the peri- and postoperative (versus preoperative) treatment groups. Finally, patient satisfaction with the quality of recovery (83 +/- 16 and 85 +/- 13 vs 72 +/- 18) and antiemetic management (96 +/- 9 and 94 +/- 10 vs 86 +/- 13) on an arbitrary scale from 0 = worst to 100 = best was significantly higher in the groups receiving peri- or postoperative (versus preoperative) acustimulation therapy. For patients discharged on the day of surgery, the time to home readiness was significantly reduced (114 +/- 41 min versus 164 +/- 50 min; P < 0.05) when acustimulation was administered perioperatively (versus preoperatively). In conclusion, acustimulation with the ReliefBand was most effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and improving patients' satisfaction with their antiemetic therapy when it was administered after surgery.

摘要

我们开展这项研究旨在评估经皮穴位电刺激联合昂丹司琼在整形手术前、后或术前及术后应用时的止吐效果。采用随机、双盲、假对照研究设计,比较三种预防性穴位刺激治疗方案:术前——手术前使用有源设备30分钟,术后使用假设备72小时;术后——手术前使用假设备30分钟,术后使用有源设备72小时;围手术期——手术前和术后均使用有源设备30分钟(每组n = 35)。所有患者均接受标准化全身麻醉,手术结束时静脉注射4毫克昂丹司琼。在术后长达72小时的特定时间间隔内,确定呕吐/干呕的发生率以及使用急救止吐药的需求。使用11分言语评定量表记录恶心评分。评估的其他结局变量包括出院时间(门诊患者)、恢复正常日常生活、完全止吐反应率以及患者对止吐治疗的满意度和恢复质量。与仅在手术前使用该设备(43%)相比,围手术期使用ReliefBand显著提高了完全缓解率(68%)。围手术期和术后(与术前相比)治疗组的术后恶心评分中位数显著降低。最后,在从0 =最差到100 =最佳的任意评分量表上,接受围手术期或术后(与术前相比)穴位刺激治疗的组中,患者对恢复质量(83±16和85±13 vs 72±18)和止吐管理(96±9和94±10 vs 86±13)的满意度显著更高。对于在手术当天出院的患者,围手术期(与术前相比)进行穴位刺激时,准备回家的时间显著缩短(114±41分钟对164±50分钟;P < 0.05)。总之,手术后使用ReliefBand进行穴位刺激在减少术后恶心和呕吐以及提高患者对止吐治疗的满意度方面最有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验