Fortney J T, Gan T J, Graczyk S, Wetchler B, Melson T, Khalil S, McKenzie R, Parrillo S, Glass P S, Moote C, Wermeling D, Parasuraman T V, Duncan B, Creed M R
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Apr;86(4):731-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00011.
Two identical, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies enrolled 2061 adult surgical outpatients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) to compare i.v. ondansetron 4 mg with droperidol 0.625 mg and droperidol 1.25 mg for the prevention of PONV. The antiemetic drugs or placebo were administered i.v. 20 min before the induction of anesthesia with a barbiturate compound, followed by maintenance with N2O/isoflurane/enflurane. Nausea, emetic episodes, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were analyzed for the 0 to 2 h and 0 to 24 h postoperative periods. In the 0 to 2 h postoperative period, there was a complete response (no emesis or rescue antiemetic) in 46% of subjects given placebo (P < 0.05 versus antiemetic groups), in 62% given ondansetron, in 63% given droperidol 0.625 mg, and in 69% given droperidol 1.25 mg (P < 0.05 versus ondansetron). In the 0 to 24-h postoperative period, there were no significant differences in complete response between the ondansetron and droperidol 0.625 or 1.25 mg groups; all groups remained superior to placebo. The proportion of patients without nausea during the 0 to 24 h postoperative period was greater in the antiemetic groups compared with the placebo group; however, droperidol 1.25 mg was more effective than ondansetron 4 mg or droperidol 0.625 mg (43% vs 29% or 29%, respectively). Headache incidence was higher in the ondansetron group compared with either droperidol group. Patient satisfaction scores did not differ significantly among antiemetic treatment groups, although all were superior to placebo. In conclusion, all antiemetic treatment regimens were superior to placebo for the prevention of PONV in the immediate postoperative period; however, droperidol 1.25 mg was more efficacious than ondansetron during the early recovery period (0-2 h). There were no significant differences between ondansetron and either droperidol dose for emesis prevention during the 0 to 24 h postoperative period.
More than 2000 patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting were given either placebo, ondansetron 4 mg, or droperidol 0.625 mg or 1.25 mg i.v. before the administration of general anesthesia. After surgery, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, medication side effects, and patient satisfaction were evaluated for 24 h. Droperidol 0.625 or 1.25 mg i.v. compared favorably with ondansetron 4 mg i.v. for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery.
两项相同的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究纳入了2061例有术后恶心呕吐(PONV)高风险的成年外科门诊患者,以比较静脉注射4毫克昂丹司琼与0.625毫克氟哌利多及1.25毫克氟哌利多预防PONV的效果。在使用巴比妥类化合物诱导麻醉前20分钟静脉注射止吐药或安慰剂,随后用氧化亚氮/异氟烷/恩氟烷维持麻醉。分析术后0至2小时和0至24小时期间的恶心、呕吐发作、不良事件及患者满意度。在术后0至2小时期间,给予安慰剂的受试者中有46%完全缓解(无呕吐或使用补救性止吐药)(与止吐药组相比,P<0.05),给予昂丹司琼的受试者中有62%,给予0.625毫克氟哌利多的受试者中有63%,给予1.25毫克氟哌利多的受试者中有69%(与昂丹司琼相比,P<0.05)。在术后0至24小时期间,昂丹司琼组与0.625毫克或1.25毫克氟哌利多组在完全缓解方面无显著差异;所有组均优于安慰剂。与安慰剂组相比,止吐药组在术后0至24小时期间无恶心的患者比例更高;然而,1.25毫克氟哌利多比4毫克昂丹司琼或0.625毫克氟哌利多更有效(分别为43%对29%或29%)。与氟哌利多组相比,昂丹司琼组头痛发生率更高。尽管所有止吐治疗组均优于安慰剂,但各止吐治疗组的患者满意度评分无显著差异。总之,在预防术后即刻的PONV方面,所有止吐治疗方案均优于安慰剂;然而,在早期恢复阶段(0至2小时),1.25毫克氟哌利多比昂丹司琼更有效。在术后0至24小时期间,昂丹司琼与两种氟哌利多剂量在预防呕吐方面无显著差异。
超过2000例有术后恶心呕吐高风险的患者在全身麻醉给药前静脉注射安慰剂、4毫克昂丹司琼或0.625毫克或1.25毫克氟哌利多。术后,评估24小时内的恶心、呕吐、药物副作用及患者满意度。静脉注射0.625毫克或1.25毫克氟哌利多在预防门诊手术后的术后恶心呕吐方面与静脉注射4毫克昂丹司琼效果相当。