Suppr超能文献

高血压的抗血栓治疗:一项Cochrane系统评价

Antithrombotic therapy in hypertension: a Cochrane Systematic review.

作者信息

Felmeden D C, Lip G Y H

机构信息

Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Mar;19(3):185-96. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001807.

Abstract

Although elevated systemic blood pressure (BP) results in high intravascular pressure, the main complications of hypertension are related to thrombosis rather than haemorrhage. It therefore seemed plausible that use of antithrombotic therapy may be useful in preventing thrombosis-related complications of elevated BP. The objectives were to conduct a systematic review of the role of antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation in patients with BP, to address the following hypotheses: (i) antiplatelet agents reduce total deaths and/or major thrombotic events when compared to placebo or other active treatment; and (ii) oral anticoagulants reduce total deaths and/or major thromboembolic events when compared to placebo or other active treatment. A systematic review of randomised studies in patients with elevated BP was performed. Studies were included if they were >3 months in duration and compared antithrombotic therapy with control or other active treatment. One meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in patients with elevated BP reported an absolute reduction in vascular events of 4.1% as compared to placebo. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) did not reduce stroke or 'all cardiovascular events' compared to placebo in primary prevention patients with elevated BP and no prior cardiovascular disease. Based on one large trial, ASA taken for 5 years reduced myocardial infarction (ARR, 0.5%, NNT 200 for 5 years), increased major haemorrhage (ARI, 0.7%, NNT 154), and did not reduce all cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. In two small trials, warfarin alone or in combination with ASA did not reduce stroke or coronary events. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as well as ticlopidine and clopidogrel have not been sufficiently evaluated in patients with elevated BP. To conclude for primary prevention in patients with elevated BP, antiplatelet therapy with ASA cannot be recommended since the magnitude of benefit, a reduction in myocardial infarction, is negated by a harm of similar magnitude, an increase in major haemorrhage. For secondary prevention in patients with elevated BP, antiplatelet therapy is recommended because the magnitude of the absolute benefit is many times greater. Warfarin therapy alone or in combination with aspirin in patients with elevated BP cannot be recommended because of lack of demonstrated benefit. Further trials of antithrombotic therapy are required in patients with elevated BP.

摘要

尽管全身血压(BP)升高会导致血管内压力升高,但高血压的主要并发症与血栓形成有关,而非出血。因此,使用抗血栓治疗可能有助于预防血压升高引起的血栓形成相关并发症,这似乎是合理的。目的是对血压升高患者中抗血小板治疗和抗凝治疗的作用进行系统评价,以探讨以下假设:(i)与安慰剂或其他活性治疗相比,抗血小板药物可降低总死亡和/或主要血栓形成事件;(ii)与安慰剂或其他活性治疗相比,口服抗凝剂可降低总死亡和/或主要血栓栓塞事件。对血压升高患者的随机研究进行了系统评价。纳入的研究持续时间超过3个月,并将抗血栓治疗与对照或其他活性治疗进行了比较。一项对血压升高患者二级预防抗血小板治疗的荟萃分析报告,与安慰剂相比,血管事件的绝对降低率为4.1%。在无既往心血管疾病的血压升高的一级预防患者中,与安慰剂相比,乙酰水杨酸(ASA)并未降低中风或“所有心血管事件”。基于一项大型试验,服用5年的ASA可降低心肌梗死(绝对风险降低率,0.5%,5年需治疗人数为200),增加大出血(绝对风险增加率,0.7%,5年需治疗人数为154),且未降低全因死亡率或心血管死亡率。在两项小型试验中,单独使用华法林或与ASA联合使用均未降低中风或冠状动脉事件。糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂以及噻氯匹定和氯吡格雷在血压升高患者中尚未得到充分评估。结论是,对于血压升高的一级预防患者,不推荐使用ASA进行抗血小板治疗,因为获益程度(心肌梗死的降低)被类似程度的危害(大出血的增加)所抵消。对于血压升高的二级预防患者,推荐使用抗血小板治疗,因为绝对获益程度要大很多倍。由于缺乏已证实的获益,不推荐血压升高患者单独使用华法林治疗或与阿司匹林联合使用。血压升高患者需要进一步进行抗血栓治疗试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验