• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗血小板和抗凝药物用于抗磷脂抗体个体血栓形成的一级预防。

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.

作者信息

Bala Malgorzata M, Paszek Elżbieta, Lesniak Wiktoria, Wloch-Kopec Dorota, Jasinska Katarzyna, Undas Anetta

机构信息

Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Department of Hygiene and Dietetics; Systematic Reviews Unit - Polish Cochrane Branch, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 7, Krakow, Poland, 31-034.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD012534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2
PMID:30004572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6513409/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies that have prothrombotic activity. Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications (recurrent miscarriage, premature birth, intrauterine growth retardation) and thrombotic events (both arterial and venous). The most common thrombotic events include brain ischaemia (stroke or transient ischaemic attack) and deep vein thrombosis. To diagnose APS, the presence of aPL antibodies in two measurements and at least one thrombotic event or pregnancy complication are required. It is unclear if people with positive aPL antibodies but without any previous thrombotic events should receive primary antithrombotic prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents versus placebo or no intervention or other intervention on the development of thrombosis in people with aPL antibodies who have not had a thrombotic event. We did not address obstetric outcomes in this review as these have been thoroughly addressed by other Cochrane Reviews.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register (4 December 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (last search 29 November 2017), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and AMED (searched 4 December 2017), and trials registries (searched 29 November 2017). We also checked reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, or their combinations, at any dose and mode of delivery with placebo, no intervention, or other intervention. We also included RCTs that compared antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents with each other or that compared two different doses of the same drug. We included studies performed in people of any age and with no history of thrombosis (as defined by APS Sapporo classification criteria or updated Sydney classification criteria), but with aPL antibodies confirmed on at last two separate measurements. The studies included both pregnant women who tested positive for aPL antibodies and had a history of recurrent obstetric complications, as well as non-pregnancy related cases with positive screening for antibodies, in accordance with the criteria mentioned above.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pairs of authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies and quality of evidence using GRADE. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third review author when necessary. In addition, one review author checked all the extracted numerical data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies involving 1044 randomised participants. The studies took place in several countries and had different funding sources. No study was at low risk of bias in all domains. We classified all included studies as at unclear or high risk of bias in two or more domains. Seven included studies focused mainly on obstetric outcomes. One study included non-pregnancy-related cases, and one study included both pregnancy-related cases and other patients with positive results for aPL antibodies. The remaining studies concerned women with aPL antibodies and a history of pregnancy failure. Four studies compared anticoagulant with or without acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) versus ASA only and observed no clear difference in thrombosis risk (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 3.77; 4 studies; 493 participants; low-quality evidence). No major bleeding was reported, but minor bleeding risk (nasal bleeding, menorrhagia) was higher in the anticoagulant with ASA group as compared with ASA alone in one study (RR 22.45, 95% CI 1.34 to 374.81; 1 study; 164 participants; low-quality evidence). In one study ASA was compared with placebo, and there were no clear differences in thrombosis (RR 5.21, 95% CI 0.63 to 42.97; 1 study; 98 participants; low-quality evidence) or minor bleeding risk between the groups (RR 3.13, 95% CI 0.34 to 29.01; 1 study; 98 participants; low-quality evidence), and no major bleeding was observed. Two studies compared ASA with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus placebo or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and no thrombotic events were observed in any of the groups. Moreover, there were no clear differences in the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (RR 9.0, 95% CI 0.49 to 164.76; 1 study; 180 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or postpartum bleeding (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.81; 1 study; 180 participants; moderate-quality evidence) between the groups. Two studies compared ASA with high-dose LMWH versus ASA with low-dose LMWF or unfractionated heparin (UFH); no thrombotic events or major bleeding was reported. Mortality and quality of life data were not reported for any of the comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit or harm of using anticoagulants with or without ASA versus ASA alone in people with aPL antibodies and a history of recurrent pregnancy loss and with no such history; ASA versus placebo in people with aPL antibodies; and ASA with LMWH versus placebo or IVIG, and ASA with high-dose LMWH versus ASA with low-dose LMWH or UFH, in women with aPL antibodies and a history of recurrent pregnancy loss, for the primary prevention of thrombotic events. In a mixed population of people with a history of previous pregnancy loss and without such a history treated with anticoagulant combined with ASA, the incidence of minor bleeding (nasal bleeding, menorrhagia) was increased when compared with ASA alone. Studies that are adequately powered and that focus mainly on thrombotic events are needed to draw any firm conclusions on the primary prevention of thrombotic events in people with antiphospholipid antibodies.

摘要

背景

抗磷脂综合征(APS)是一种自身免疫性疾病,其特征是存在具有促血栓形成活性的抗磷脂(aPL)抗体。抗磷脂抗体与妊娠并发症(复发性流产、早产、胎儿生长受限)和血栓形成事件(动脉和静脉)的风险增加相关。最常见的血栓形成事件包括脑缺血(中风或短暂性脑缺血发作)和深静脉血栓形成。要诊断APS,需要两次检测中均存在aPL抗体,且至少有一次血栓形成事件或妊娠并发症。目前尚不清楚aPL抗体阳性但既往无血栓形成事件的患者是否应接受一级抗血栓预防。

目的

评估抗血小板或抗凝药物与安慰剂、无干预措施或其他干预措施相比,对既往无血栓形成事件的aPL抗体阳性患者发生血栓形成的影响。由于其他Cochrane系统评价已对产科结局进行了全面探讨,因此本综述未涉及产科结局。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane血管专业注册库(2017年12月4日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(最后检索时间为2017年11月29日)、MEDLINE Ovid、Embase Ovid、CINAHL和AMED(检索时间为2017年12月4日)以及试验注册库(检索时间为2017年11月29日)。我们还查阅了纳入研究、系统评价和实践指南的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家。

选择标准

我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了任何剂量和给药方式的抗血小板或抗凝药物及其组合与安慰剂、无干预措施或其他干预措施。我们还纳入了比较抗血小板或抗凝药物相互之间或比较同一药物两种不同剂量的RCT。我们纳入了在任何年龄且无血栓形成病史(根据APS札幌分类标准或更新的悉尼分类标准定义)的人群中进行的研究,但至少两次独立检测证实存在aPL抗体。根据上述标准,研究包括aPL抗体检测呈阳性且有复发性产科并发症病史的孕妇,以及抗体筛查呈阳性的非妊娠相关病例。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立选择纳入研究、提取数据,并使用GRADE评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和证据质量。如有任何差异,通过讨论解决,必要时咨询第三位综述作者。此外,一位综述作者检查了所有提取的数值数据。

主要结果

我们纳入了9项研究,涉及1044名随机参与者。这些研究在多个国家进行,资金来源不同。没有一项研究在所有领域均处于低偏倚风险。我们将所有纳入研究归类为在两个或更多领域处于不清楚或高偏倚风险。7项纳入研究主要关注产科结局。1项研究纳入了非妊娠相关病例,1项研究纳入了妊娠相关病例和aPL抗体检测呈阳性的其他患者。其余研究涉及有aPL抗体和妊娠失败病史的女性。4项研究比较了使用或不使用乙酰水杨酸(ASA)的抗凝剂与仅使用ASA的情况,未观察到血栓形成风险有明显差异(风险比(RR)0.98,95%置信区间(CI)0.25至3.77;4项研究;493名参与者;低质量证据)。未报告重大出血,但在一项研究中,与仅使用ASA相比,使用ASA的抗凝剂组轻微出血风险(鼻出血、月经过多)更高(RR 22.45,95%CI 1.34至374.81;1项研究;164名参与者;低质量证据)。在一项研究中,将ASA与安慰剂进行了比较,两组之间在血栓形成(RR 5.21,95%CI 0.63至42.97;1项研究;98名参与者;低质量证据)或轻微出血风险方面没有明显差异(RR 3.13,95%CI 0.34至29.01;1项研究;98名参与者;低质量证据),且未观察到重大出血。2项研究比较了ASA与低分子量肝素(LMWH)与安慰剂或静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),任何一组均未观察到血栓形成事件。此外,两组之间在需要输血的出血风险(RR 9.0,95%CI 0.49至164.76;1项研究;180名参与者;中等质量证据)或产后出血(RR 1.30,95%CI 0.60至2.81;1项研究;180名参与者;中等质量证据)方面没有明显差异。2项研究比较了高剂量LMWH与低剂量LMWF或普通肝素(UFH)联合ASA的情况;未报告血栓形成事件或重大出血。所有比较均未报告死亡率和生活质量数据。

作者结论

对于有复发性流产病史和无此类病史且aPL抗体阳性的患者,使用或不使用ASA的抗凝剂与仅使用ASA相比,以及aPL抗体阳性患者中ASA与安慰剂相比,还有有复发性流产病史且aPL抗体阳性的女性中ASA与LMWH与安慰剂或IVIG相比,以及高剂量LMWH与低剂量LMWH或UFH联合ASA相比,在血栓形成事件的一级预防方面,均没有足够的证据证明其有益或有害。在既往有流产病史和无此类病史混合人群中,与仅使用ASA相比,使用抗凝剂联合ASA治疗时轻微出血(鼻出血、月经过多)的发生率增加。需要进行有足够统计学效力且主要关注血栓形成事件的研究,才能就抗磷脂抗体阳性患者血栓形成事件的一级预防得出任何确切结论。

相似文献

1
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.抗血小板和抗凝药物用于抗磷脂抗体个体血栓形成的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD012534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2.
2
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.抗血小板药物治疗深静脉血栓形成。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 25;7(7):CD012369. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012369.pub2.
3
Anticoagulants for people hospitalised with COVID-19.COVID-19 住院患者的抗凝治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 4;3(3):CD013739. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013739.pub2.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.深静脉血栓形成的家庭治疗与住院治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;1(1):CD003076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003076.pub3.
6
Antithrombotic therapy for ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents.多发性骨髓瘤患者接受免疫调节剂治疗时的门诊抗血栓治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD014739. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014739.
7
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
8
Continuation versus discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy for bleeding and ischaemic events in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术成年患者抗血小板治疗的继续与停用对出血和缺血事件的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 18;7(7):CD012584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012584.pub2.
9
Antithrombotic therapy to prevent cognitive decline in people with small vessel disease on neuroimaging but without dementia.抗血栓治疗预防神经影像学检查发现的小血管疾病但无痴呆的患者认知能力下降。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 14;7(7):CD012269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012269.pub2.
10
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study.调查试验撤稿对医疗证据生态系统的影响(活力研究I):回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2025 Apr 23;389:e082068. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082068.
2
Unresolved issues in the diagnosis and management of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.血栓性抗磷脂综合征诊断与管理中的未解决问题。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Mar 7;9(2):102724. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102724. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric lupus.神经精神狼疮的诊断与治疗新进展。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;20(11):712-728. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01163-z. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
4
Risk factors of first thrombosis in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.产科抗磷脂综合征患者首次血栓形成的危险因素。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Jan 3;11(1):e001044. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001044.
5
Antiphospholipid Syndrome: State of the Art of Clinical Management.抗磷脂综合征:临床管理的最新进展
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Apr;39(2):385-404. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07496-3. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
6
An Antiphospholipid Antibody Profile as a Biomarker for Thrombophilia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.抗磷脂抗体谱作为系统性红斑狼疮血栓形成的生物标志物。
Biomolecules. 2023 Mar 30;13(4):617. doi: 10.3390/biom13040617.
7
Primary Anti-Phospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Real-World Defining Features of Rethrombosis in the Course of Disease.原发性抗磷脂抗体综合征:疾病过程中再血栓形成的真实世界定义特征
Int J Rheumatol. 2022 Nov 10;2022:7331586. doi: 10.1155/2022/7331586. eCollection 2022.
8
When Blood Is Being Difficult: Clotting and Bleeding in a Patient With Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Supratherapeutic International Normalized Ratio.当血液状况复杂时:抗磷脂抗体综合征及国际标准化比值超治疗范围患者的凝血与出血情况
Cureus. 2022 Jun 4;14(6):e25659. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25659. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Combined detection of anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies may predict pregnancy outcome.抗心磷脂抗体和抗β2糖蛋白1抗体联合检测可能预测妊娠结局。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Mar 15;14(3):1750-1756. eCollection 2022.
10
Thrombus-Targeting Polymeric Nanocarriers and Their Biomedical Applications in Thrombolytic Therapy.血栓靶向聚合物纳米载体及其在溶栓治疗中的生物医学应用
Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 30;12:763085. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.763085. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in people with antiphospholipid syndrome.抗血小板和抗凝药物用于抗磷脂综合征患者中风和其他血栓栓塞事件的二级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 2;10(10):CD012169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012169.pub2.
2
Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients.普通肝素与低分子量肝素用于预防术后患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD007557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007557.pub3.
3
International clinical practice guidelines including guidance for direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.国际临床实践指南,包括癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症治疗和预防中直接口服抗凝剂的指南。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):e452-e466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30369-2.
4
Optimizing the safety of treatment for venous thromboembolism in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.在直接口服抗凝剂时代优化静脉血栓栓塞症的治疗安全性。
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016 Sep 5;126(9):688-696. doi: 10.20452/pamw.3547.
5
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin to treat patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (RAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial.利伐沙班与华法林治疗血栓形成性抗磷脂综合征患者(无论是否合并系统性红斑狼疮)(RAPS):一项随机、对照、开放标签的2/3期非劣效性试验。
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Sep;3(9):e426-36. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30079-5.
6
Rivaroxaban limits complement activation compared with warfarin in antiphospholipid syndrome patients with venous thromboembolism.利伐沙班与华法林相比可限制抗磷脂综合征伴静脉血栓栓塞患者的补体激活。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Nov;14(11):2177-2186. doi: 10.1111/jth.13475. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
EULAR recommendations for women's health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome.欧洲抗风湿病联盟关于系统性红斑狼疮和/或抗磷脂综合征患者的妇女健康以及计划生育、辅助生殖、妊娠和更年期管理的建议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):476-485. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209770. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.阿司匹林用于心血管事件一级预防的系统评价:美国预防服务工作组的证据审查。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):804-13. doi: 10.7326/M15-2113. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
9
Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.抗栓治疗 VTE 疾病:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告。
Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):315-352. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
Randomized controlled study of pre-conception thromboprophylaxis among patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion related to antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征相关复发性自然流产患者孕前血栓预防的随机对照研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Dec 2.