Harvey John N, Parker David, De Parijat, Shrimali Raj K, Otter Mark
Wrexham Academic Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Maelor Hospital, Croesnewydd Road, Wrexham LL13 7TD, United Kingdom.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2005 Feb;33(2):57-62. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20092.
This study was conducted to assess the value of sonographically guided core biopsy in the evaluation of thyroid nodules by comparison with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) performed with and without sonographic guidance.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 645 thyroid samples obtained at a single center. Samples came from 422 patients who underwent FNAC (with or without sonographic guidance), sonographically guided core biopsy, or excision of thyroid tissue with or without prior frozen sectioning. Final diagnoses were obtained from surgery or clinical follow-up. Initial and final diagnoses were compared.
Adequate samples for assessment were obtained in 87% of core biopsies, compared with 60% of cytology aspirates (p <0.001). Sonographically guided core biopsy and sonographically guided FNAC both had zero false-negative rates for the diagnosis of malignancy, compared with a 7.0% false-negative rate (95% confidence interval, 2.0-12.0%) for aspiration cytology when sonography was not used. With core biopsy, 11% of patients required surgical confirmation of the diagnosis, compared with 43% of patients following FNAC (p <0.001). There were no major complications following core biopsy.
Sonographically guided core biopsy provides an accurate and safe alternative to FNAC in the assessment of thyroid nodules.
本研究旨在通过与超声引导下和非超声引导下的细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)相比较,评估超声引导下的粗针活检在甲状腺结节评估中的价值。
我们对在单一中心连续获取的645份甲状腺样本进行了回顾性分析。样本来自422例接受了FNAC(有或无超声引导)、超声引导下粗针活检或甲状腺组织切除(有或无术前冰冻切片)的患者。最终诊断通过手术或临床随访获得。比较初始诊断和最终诊断。
87%的粗针活检获得了足够用于评估的样本,而细胞学穿刺抽吸样本的这一比例为60%(p<0.001)。超声引导下粗针活检和超声引导下FNAC对恶性肿瘤诊断的假阴性率均为零,相比之下,未使用超声检查时,穿刺细胞学检查的假阴性率为7.0%(95%置信区间,2.0-12.0%)。采用粗针活检时,11%的患者需要手术确诊,而FNAC后这一比例为43%(p<0.001)。粗针活检后无重大并发症。
在甲状腺结节评估中,超声引导下粗针活检为FNAC提供了一种准确且安全的替代方法。