文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

晚期肾细胞癌的免疫疗法。

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer.

作者信息

Coppin C, Porzsolt F, Awa A, Kumpf J, Coldman A, Wilt T

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Fraser Valley Cancer Centre, 13750-96th Avenue, Surrey, BC, Canada, V3V 1Z2.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD001425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001425.pub2.


DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001425.pub2
PMID:15674877
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alfa to other options. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival at one year, with remission as the main secondary outcome of interest. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted for the period 1966 through end of December 2003. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the periodic meetings of the American Urologic Association, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ECCO - the European Cancer Conference, and the European Society of Medical Oncology for the period 1995 to June 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported remission or survival by allocation. Fifty-three identified studies involving 6117 patients were eligible and all but one reported remission; 32 of these studies reported the one-year survival outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment remission (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alfa versus controls, and for two randomized studies of the value of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa in fit patients with metastases detected at the time of diagnosis. MAIN RESULTS: Combined data for a variety of immunotherapies gave an overall chance of partial or complete remission of only 12.9% (99 study arms), compared to 2.5% in 10 non-immunotherapy control arms, and 4.3% in two placebo arms. Twenty-eight percent of these remissions were designated as complete (data from 45 studies). Median survival averaged 13.3 months (range by arm, 6 to 27+ months). The difference in remission rate between arms was poorly correlated with the difference in median survival so that remission rate is not a good surrogate or intermediate outcome for survival for advanced renal cancer. We were unable to identify any published randomized study of high-dose interleukin-2 versus a non-immunotherapy control, or of high-dose interleukin-2 versus interferon-alfa reporting survival. It has been established that reduced dose interleukin-2 given by intravenous bolus or by subcutaneous injection provides equivalent survival to high dose interleukin-2 with less toxicity. Results from four studies (644 patients) indicate that interferon-alfa is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.77). Using the method of Parmar 1998, the pooled overall hazard ratio for death was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.88). The weighted average median improvement in survival was 3.8 months. T he optimal dose and duration of interferon-alfa remains to be elucidated. The addition of a variety of enhancers, including lower dose intravenous or subcutaneous interleukin-2, has failed to improve survival compared to interferon-alfa alone. Two recent randomized studies have examined the role of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa therapy in highly selected fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms: despite minimal improvement in the chance of remission, both studies of up-front nephrectomy improved median survival by 4.8 months over interferon-alfa alone. Recent studies have been examining anti-angiogenesis agents. A landmark study of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, was associated with significant prolongation of the time to progression of disease when given at high dose compared to low-dose or placebo therapy though frequency of remissions or survival were not improved. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: interferon-alfa provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. In fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms, nephrectomy followed by interferon-alfa gives the best survival strategy for fully validated therapies. The need for more effective specific therapy for this condition is apparent.

摘要

背景:晚期肾细胞癌的病程变化极大,从自发缓解到对化疗难治的疾病进展。基于非对照研究和通常受样本量小及效能低限制的随机对照试验,免疫疗法有望改善治疗结果。 目的:通过比较:(1)高剂量白细胞介素 - 2与其他疗法;(2)干扰素 - α与其他疗法,来评估晚期肾细胞癌的免疫疗法。主要关注的结局是一年时的总生存,缓解作为主要的次要关注结局。 检索策略:对1966年至2003年12月底的CENTRAL、MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行了系统检索。对1995年至2004年6月期间美国泌尿外科学会、美国临床肿瘤学会、欧洲癌症大会(ECCO)以及欧洲医学肿瘤学会的定期会议论文集进行了手工检索。 入选标准:随机对照试验,选择(或分层)晚期肾细胞癌患者,至少在一个研究组中使用免疫治疗药物,并按分配情况报告缓解或生存情况。确定的53项研究涉及611名患者符合条件,除一项外均报告了缓解情况;其中32项研究报告了一年生存结局。 数据收集与分析:两名研究者按照预先设计的方案独立提取每篇文章的数据。治疗缓解(部分缓解加完全缓解)和一年时死亡的二分结局用于主要比较。生存风险比也用于干扰素 - α与对照的研究,以及两项关于在诊断时检测到转移的合适患者中,干扰素 - α治疗前初始肾切除术价值的随机研究。 主要结果:多种免疫疗法的综合数据显示,部分或完全缓解的总体机会仅为12.9%(99个研究组),相比之下,10个非免疫治疗对照组为2.5%,两个安慰剂组为4.3%。这些缓解中有28%被指定为完全缓解(来自45项研究的数据)。中位生存平均为13.3个月(各研究组范围为6至27 + 个月)。各研究组之间缓解率的差异与中位生存的差异相关性较差,因此缓解率不是晚期肾癌生存的良好替代指标或中间结局。我们未能找到任何已发表的关于高剂量白细胞介素 - 2与非免疫治疗对照,或高剂量白细胞介素 - 2与干扰素 - α比较报告生存情况的随机研究。已证实静脉推注或皮下注射低剂量白细胞介素 - 2与高剂量白细胞介素 - 2具有同等生存效果且毒性较小。四项研究(644名患者)的结果表明,干扰素 - α优于对照(一年时死亡的OR = 0.56,95%置信区间0.40至0.77)。使用1998年Parmar的方法,合并的总体死亡风险比为0.74(95%置信区间0.63至0.88)。生存的加权平均中位改善为3.8个月。干扰素 - α的最佳剂量和疗程仍有待阐明。与单独使用干扰素 - α相比,添加包括低剂量静脉或皮下白细胞介素 - 2在内的多种增强剂未能改善生存。最近两项随机研究探讨了在诊断时高度选择的适合且有转移但症状轻微的患者中,干扰素 - α治疗前初始肾切除术的作用:尽管缓解机会改善甚微,但两项前期肾切除术研究均使中位生存比单独使用干扰素 - α提高了4.8个月。最近的研究一直在研究抗血管生成药物。一项关于抗血管内皮生长因子抗体贝伐单抗的里程碑式研究表明,与低剂量或安慰剂治疗相比,高剂量给药时可显著延长疾病进展时间,尽管缓解频率或生存率未得到改善。 作者结论:与其他常用治疗相比,干扰素 - α可提供适度的生存获益,应被视为未来全身治疗药物研究的对照组。对于诊断时有转移且症状轻微的适合患者,肾切除术后继以干扰素 - α治疗是已充分验证的疗法中最佳的生存策略。显然需要针对这种情况的更有效的特异性治疗。

相似文献

[1]
Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-1-25

[2]
Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000

[3]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[4]
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2006-8

[5]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[6]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[7]
Bisphosphonates for breast cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20

[8]
Nivolumab for adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma (a rapid review using the software RobotReviewer).

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-7-12

[9]
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-9

[10]
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-7-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Single-cell combined bioinformatics analysis: construction of immune cluster and risk prognostic model in kidney renal clear cells based on CD8 T cell-associated genes.

Eur J Med Res. 2024-1-30

[2]
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023-4-15

[3]
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma: A study based on SEER database.

Front Oncol. 2022-9-28

[4]
The Frontline Immunotherapy-Based Treatment of Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspective.

Biomedicines. 2022-1-24

[5]
Bibliometric analysis of the 100 top-cited articles on immunotherapy of urological cancer.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022-12-31

[6]
Preferences for Renal Cell Carcinoma Pharmacological Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Patients and Oncologists.

Front Oncol. 2022-1-7

[7]
Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Cancer: Clinical and Experimental Evidence.

Cancers (Basel). 2021-9-13

[8]
Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Immunotherapies Have Demonstrated Overall Survival Benefits While Targeted Therapies Have Not.

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020-11-28

[9]
Immuno-oncology: a narrative review of gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities.

Ann Transl Med. 2021-3

[10]
Molecular correlates of response to nivolumab at baseline and on treatment in patients with RCC.

J Immunother Cancer. 2021-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索