Suppr超能文献

针对接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者的心脏保护干预措施。

Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines.

作者信息

van Dalen E C, Caron H N, Dickinson H O, Kremer L C M

机构信息

Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital / Academic Medical Center (room F8-257), PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1100 DD.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD003917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003917.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of different cardioprotective agents in preventing heart damage in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the databases of CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2002). In addition, we handsearched reference lists and conference proceedings of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (1998 to 2002).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which any cardioprotective agent was compared to no additional or placebo therapy in cancer patients (children and adults) receiving anthracyclines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified RCTs for 5 cardioprotective agents: N-acetylcysteine (1 study; 54 patients), phenetylamines (2 studies; 100 patients), coenzyme Q10 (1 study; 20 patients), combination of vitamin E, vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine (1 study; 14 patients) and dexrazoxane (6 studies; 1013 patients). All studies had methodological limitations. Due to the insufficient number of studies, for the first four mentioned cardioprotective agents pooling of the results was impossible. None of the individual studies showed a cardioprotective effect. The meta-analysis of the dexrazoxane-studies showed a statistically significant benefit in favour of dexrazoxane for the occurrence of heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.28, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.42, P < 0.00001). No statistically significant difference in response rate between the dexrazoxane and control group was found (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01, P = 0.06), but there was some suggestion that patients treated with dexrazoxane might have a lower anti-tumour response rate. Our meta-analysis of survival showed no significant difference between the dexrazoxane and control group. For adverse effects pooling was impossible. However, no important differences in the occurrence of side effects were found. The majority of the patients included in this meta-analysis were adults with advanced breast cancer.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For cardioprotective agents for which pooling was impossible no high quality evidence was available and therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made about their efficacy. Dexrazoxane prevents heart damage, however there was some suggestion that patients treated with dexrazoxane might have a lower anti-tumour response rate. There was no significant difference in survival between the dexrazoxane and control group. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines. However, for each individual patient clinicians should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of a lower response rate.

摘要

背景

蒽环类药物是治疗多种恶性肿瘤最有效的化疗药物之一。不幸的是,其应用受到剂量依赖性心脏毒性的限制。为预防这种心脏毒性,人们对不同的心脏保护剂进行了研究。

目的

本综述的目的是评估不同心脏保护剂对接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者预防心脏损害的疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了CENTRAL(考克兰图书馆,2002年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2002年8月)和EMBASE(1980年至2002年8月)数据库。此外,我们还手工检索了国际儿科肿瘤学会(SIOP)和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)(1998年至2002年)的参考文献列表和会议记录。

选择标准

随机对照试验(RCT),其中将任何心脏保护剂与接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者(儿童和成人)中不使用额外治疗或安慰剂治疗进行比较。

数据收集与分析

两名综述作者独立进行研究选择、质量评估和数据提取,包括不良反应。

主要结果

我们确定了5种心脏保护剂的随机对照试验:N-乙酰半胱氨酸(1项研究;54例患者)、苯乙胺类(2项研究;100例患者)、辅酶Q10(1项研究;20例患者)、维生素E、维生素C和N-乙酰半胱氨酸联合用药(1项研究;14例患者)以及右丙亚胺(6项研究;1013例患者)。所有研究均存在方法学局限性。由于研究数量不足,无法对上述前四种心脏保护剂的结果进行汇总。没有任何一项单独的研究显示出心脏保护作用。右丙亚胺研究的荟萃分析显示,在心力衰竭的发生方面,右丙亚胺具有统计学上显著的优势(相对危险度(RR)=0.28,95%置信区间(CI)0.18至0.42,P<0.00001)。右丙亚胺组与对照组之间的缓解率没有统计学上的显著差异(RR=0.88,95%CI 0.77至1.01,P=0.06),但有迹象表明接受右丙亚胺治疗的患者可能具有较低的抗肿瘤缓解率。我们对生存率的荟萃分析显示右丙亚胺组与对照组之间没有显著差异。关于不良反应,无法进行汇总。然而,在副作用的发生方面未发现重要差异。纳入该荟萃分析的大多数患者为晚期乳腺癌成人患者。

作者结论

对于无法进行汇总分析的心脏保护剂,没有高质量的证据,因此无法对其疗效得出明确结论。右丙亚胺可预防心脏损害,然而有迹象表明接受右丙亚胺治疗的患者可能具有较低的抗肿瘤缓解率。右丙亚胺组与对照组之间的生存率没有显著差异。我们得出结论,如果预期心脏损害风险较高,对于接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者使用右丙亚胺可能是合理的。然而,对于每一位个体患者,临床医生应权衡右丙亚胺的心脏保护作用与可能较低缓解率的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验