van Dalen E C, Caron H N, Dickinson H O, Kremer L C M
Emma Children's Hospital / Academic Medical Center (room F8-257), Pediatric Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1100 DD.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD003917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003917.pub3.
Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied.
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of different cardioprotective agents in preventing heart damage in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.
We searched the databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2007). In addition, we handsearched reference lists and conference proceedings of the SIOP and ASCO meetings (1998 to 2006).
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which any cardioprotective agent was compared to no additional or placebo therapy in cancer patients (children and adults) receiving anthracyclines.
Two review authors independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.
We identified RCTs for seven cardioprotective agents: N-acetylcysteine, phenetylamines, coenzyme Q10, combination of vitamins E and C and N-acetylcysteine, L-carnitine, carvedilol and dexrazoxane (mostly adults with advanced breast cancer). All studies had methodological limitations. For the first six agents, there were too few studies to allow pooling of results. None of the individual studies showed a cardioprotective effect. The nine included studies of dexrazoxane enrolled 1403 patients. The meta-analysis of dexrazoxane showed a statistically significant benefit in favour of dexrazoxane for the occurrence of heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) 0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.41). No evidence was found for a difference in response rate or survival between the dexrazoxane and control group. Only for one adverse effect (abnormal white blood cell count at nadir) a difference in favour of the control group was identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For cardioprotective agents for which pooling was impossible, no definitive conclusions can be made about their efficacy. Dexrazoxane prevents heart damage and no evidence for a difference in response rate or survival between the dexrazoxane and control group was identified. Only for an abnormal white blood cell count at nadir a clearly significant difference in favour of the control group was identified. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines. However, for each individual patient clinicians should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of adverse effects.
蒽环类药物是治疗多种恶性肿瘤最有效的化疗药物之一。不幸的是,其使用受到剂量依赖性心脏毒性的限制。为预防这种心脏毒性,人们对不同的心脏保护剂进行了研究。
本综述的目的是评估不同心脏保护剂在预防接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者心脏损伤方面的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL,2007年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2007年4月)和EMBASE(1980年至2007年4月)的数据库。此外,我们还手工检索了国际小儿肿瘤学会(SIOP)和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)会议(1998年至2006年)的参考文献列表和会议记录。
随机对照试验(RCT),其中将任何心脏保护剂与接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者(儿童和成人)不进行额外治疗或使用安慰剂治疗进行比较。
两位综述作者独立进行研究选择、质量评估和数据提取,包括不良反应。
我们确定了七种心脏保护剂的随机对照试验:N - 乙酰半胱氨酸、苯乙胺类、辅酶Q10、维生素E和C与N - 乙酰半胱氨酸的组合、左旋肉碱、卡维地洛和右丙亚胺(大多数为晚期乳腺癌成人患者)。所有研究都存在方法学上的局限性。对于前六种药物,研究数量太少,无法汇总结果。没有一项单独的研究显示出心脏保护作用。纳入的九项关于右丙亚胺的研究共纳入了1403名患者。右丙亚胺的荟萃分析显示,在发生心力衰竭方面,右丙亚胺具有统计学上显著的益处(相对风险(RR)0.29,95%可信区间0.20至0.41)。未发现右丙亚胺组和对照组在缓解率或生存率方面存在差异。仅在一种不良反应(最低点时白细胞计数异常)方面,发现对照组更具优势。
对于无法汇总分析的心脏保护剂,无法就其疗效得出明确结论。右丙亚胺可预防心脏损伤,且未发现右丙亚胺组和对照组在缓解率或生存率方面存在差异。仅在最低点时白细胞计数异常方面,明确发现对照组具有显著优势。我们得出结论,如果预计心脏损伤风险较高,那么在接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者中使用右丙亚胺可能是合理的。然而,对于每一位患者,临床医生应权衡右丙亚胺的心脏保护作用与可能的不良反应风险。