McCall E M, Alderdice F A, Halliday H L, Jenkins J G, Vohra S
Department of Child Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT12 6BJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004210. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004210.pub2.
Hypothermia incurred during routine postnatal resuscitation is a world-wide issue (across all climates), with associated morbidity and mortality. Keeping vulnerable preterm infants warm is problematic even when recommended routine thermal care guidelines are followed in the delivery suite.
To assess efficacy and safety of interventions, designed for prevention of hypothermia in preterm and/or low birthweight infants, applied within 10 minutes after birth in the delivery suite compared with routine thermal care.
The standard search strategy of The Cochrane Collaboration was followed. Electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE (1966 to May Week 4 2004 ), CINAHL (1982 to May Week 4 2004), EMBASE (1974 to 09/07/04), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE 1994 to July 2004), conference/symposia proceedings using ZETOC (1993 to July 2004), ISI proceedings (1990 to 09/07/2004) and OCLC WorldCat (July 2004). Identified articles were cross-referenced. No language restrictions were imposed.
All trials using randomised or quasi-randomised allocations to test a specific intervention designed to prevent hypothermia, (apart from 'routine' thermal care) applied within 10 minutes after birth in the delivery suite to infants of < 37 weeks' gestational age or birthweight </=2500 g.
Methodological quality was assessed and data were extracted for important clinical outcomes including adverse effects of the intervention by at least three independent reviewers. Authors were contacted for missing data. Data were analysed using RevMan 4.2.5. Relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence limits were calculated for each dichotomous outcome and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence limits for continuous outcomes.
Six studies giving a total of 304 infants randomised and 295 completing the studies were included. Four comparisons to 'routine care' were undertaken within two categories: 1) barriers to heat loss (four studies): plastic wrap or bag (three), stockinet caps (one) and 2) external heat sources (two studies): skin-to-skin (one), transwarmer mattress (one). Plastic barriers were effective in reducing heat losses in infants < 28 weeks' gestation (three studies, n = 159; WMD 0.76 degrees C; 95% CI 0.49, 1.03) but not in the 28 to 31 week group. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that plastic wrap reduces the risk of death within hospital stay (three studies, n = 161; typical RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.32, 1.22; typical RD -0.09; 95% CI -0.20, 0.03). There was no evidence of a significant difference in major brain injury, mean duration of oxygen therapy or hospitalisation for infants < 29 weeks' gestation. Stockinet caps were not effective (borderline significant for infants < 2000 g birthweight) in reducing heat losses.Skin-to-skin care was shown to be effective in reducing the risk of hypothermia when compared to conventional incubator care for infants 1200 to 2199 g birthweight (one study, n = 31; RR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01, 0.64; NNT 2; 2 to 4). The transwarmer mattress significantly kept infants </=1500 g warmer and reduced the incidence of hypothermia on admission to NICU (one study, n = 24; RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.11, 0.83; NNT 2 range 2 to 4).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Plastic wraps or bags, skin-to-skin care and transwarmer mattresses all keep preterm infants warmer, leading to higher temperatures on admission to neonatal units and less hypothermia. Given the low NNT, consideration should be given to using these interventions in the delivery suite. However, the small numbers of infants and studies and the absence of long term follow-up mean that firm recommendations for clinical practice cannot be given. There is a need to conduct large, high quality randomised controlled trials looking at long-term outcomes.
常规产后复苏期间发生的体温过低是一个全球性问题(在所有气候条件下),会导致相关的发病率和死亡率。即使在产房遵循推荐的常规体温护理指南,保持脆弱的早产儿温暖仍存在问题。
评估与常规体温护理相比,在产房出生后10分钟内应用的旨在预防早产儿和/或低出生体重儿体温过低的干预措施的有效性和安全性。
遵循Cochrane协作网的标准检索策略。检索了电子数据库:MEDLINE(1966年至2004年第5周)、CINAHL(1982年至2004年第5周)、EMBASE(1974年至2004年7月9日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆,2004年第3期)、效果评价文摘数据库(DARE,1994年至2004年7月)、使用ZETOC的会议/研讨会论文集(1993年至2004年7月)、ISI会议录(1990年至2004年7月9日)和OCLC WorldCat(2004年7月)。对已识别的文章进行交叉引用。未设语言限制。
所有采用随机或半随机分配方法来测试旨在预防体温过低的特定干预措施(除“常规”体温护理外)的试验,这些干预措施在产房出生后10分钟内应用于孕周<37周或出生体重≤2500g的婴儿。
评估方法学质量,并由至少三名独立评审员提取重要临床结局的数据,包括干预措施的不良反应。联系作者获取缺失数据。使用RevMan 4.2.5进行数据分析。计算每个二分结局的相对危险度(RR)、危险度差值(RD)和需要治疗的人数(NNT)及其95%置信区间,对于连续结局计算均值差值(MD)及其95%置信区间。
纳入了6项研究,共304名婴儿被随机分组,295名完成研究。在两类中与“常规护理 ”进行了四项比较:1)减少热量散失的屏障(四项研究):保鲜膜或保鲜袋(三项)、针织帽(一项);2)外部热源(两项研究):母婴皮肤接触(一项)、变温床垫(一项)。保鲜膜对孕周<28周的婴儿减少热量散失有效(三项研究,n = 159;加权均数差值0.76℃;95%置信区间0.49,1.03),但对28至31周组无效。没有足够证据表明保鲜膜能降低住院期间的死亡风险(三项研究,n = 161;典型RR 0.63;95%置信区间0.32,1.22;典型RD -0.09;95%置信区间 -0.20,0.03)。对于孕周<29周的婴儿,在严重脑损伤、平均吸氧时间或住院时间方面没有显著差异的证据。针织帽在减少热量散失方面无效(出生体重<2000g的婴儿接近显著)。与传统暖箱护理相比,母婴皮肤接触对出生体重1200至2199g的婴儿预防体温过低有效(一项研究,n = 31;RR 0.09;95%置信区间0.01,0.64;NNT 2;2至4)。变温床垫能显著使体重≤1500g的婴儿体温升高,并降低入住新生儿重症监护病房时体温过低的发生率(一项研究,n = 24;RR 0.30;95%置信区间0.11,0.83;NNT 2,范围2至4)。
保鲜膜或保鲜袋、母婴皮肤接触和变温床垫都能使早产儿保持温暖,使新生儿病房入院时体温更高,体温过低情况更少。鉴于需要治疗的人数较少,应考虑在产房使用这些干预措施。然而,婴儿和研究数量较少且缺乏长期随访,这意味着无法给出针对临床实践的明确建议。需要开展大规模、高质量的随机对照试验以观察长期结局。