Sundaram V, Haridas A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004240. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004240.pub2.
Strabismus, or squint, can be defined as a deviation from perfect ocular alignment and can be classified in many ways according to its aetiology and presentation. Treatment can be broadly divided into medical and surgical options, with a variety of surgical techniques being available, including the use of adjustable or non-adjustable sutures for the extra ocular muscles. There exists an uncertainty as to which of these techniques produces a better surgical outcome, and also an opinion that the adjustable suture technique may be of greater benefit in certain situations.
The objectives of this review were to examine whether adjustable or non-adjustable sutures are associated with a more accurate long-term ocular alignment following strabismus surgery and to identify any specific situations in which it would be of benefit to use a particular method.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library (which includes the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (Issue 3 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), EMBASE (1980 to August 2004), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences) (July 2004). We contacted experts in the field for further information. There were no language restrictions in the electronic searches.
We planned to include only randomised controlled trials comparing adjustable to non-adjustable sutures for strabismus surgery.
No studies were found that met the inclusion criteria for this review.
No studies were found that met the inclusion criteria for this review, therefore none were included for analysis. Results of non-randomised studies that compared these techniques are reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No reliable conclusions could be reached regarding which technique (adjustable or non-adjustable sutures) produces a more accurate long-term ocular alignment following strabismus surgery or in which specific situations one technique is of greater benefit than the other. High quality randomised controlled trials are needed to obtain clinically valid results and to clarify these issues.
斜视,即斜眼,可定义为眼位未能完全对齐,根据其病因和表现可有多种分类方式。治疗方法大致可分为药物治疗和手术治疗,有多种手术技术可供选择,包括用于眼外肌的可调节或不可调节缝线。目前尚不确定哪种技术能产生更好的手术效果,也有一种观点认为可调节缝线技术在某些情况下可能更有益。
本综述的目的是研究斜视手术后,可调节缝线或不可调节缝线是否与更精确的长期眼位对齐相关,并确定使用特定方法有益的任何具体情况。
我们检索了《考克兰系统评价数据库》中的考克兰对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(包括考克兰眼科和视力组试验注册库)(2004年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2004年7月)、EMBASE(1980年至2004年8月)、LILACS(拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学文献)(2004年7月)。我们联系了该领域的专家以获取更多信息。电子检索没有语言限制。
我们计划仅纳入比较斜视手术中可调节缝线与不可调节缝线的随机对照试验。
未找到符合本综述纳入标准的研究。
未找到符合本综述纳入标准的研究,因此未纳入任何研究进行分析。报告了比较这些技术的非随机研究结果。
关于哪种技术(可调节或不可调节缝线)在斜视手术后能产生更精确的长期眼位对齐,或者在哪些具体情况下一种技术比另一种技术更有益,无法得出可靠结论。需要高质量的随机对照试验以获得临床有效结果并阐明这些问题。