Townsend James T, Fifić Mario
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-7007, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Aug;66(6):953-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03194987.
Many mental tasks that involve operations on a number of items take place within a few hundred milliseconds. In such tasks, whether the items are processed simultaneously (in parallel) or sequentially (serially) has long been of interest to psychologists. Although certain types of parallel and serial models have been ruled out, it has proven extremely difficult to entirely separate reasonable serial and limited-capacity parallel models on the basis of typical data. Recent advances in theory-driven methodology now permit strong tests of serial versus parallel processing in such tasks, in ways that bypass the capacity issue and that are distribution and parameter free. We employ new methodologies to assess serial versus parallel processing and find strong evidence for pure serial or pure parallel processing, with some striking apparent differences across individuals and interstimulus conditions.
许多涉及对多个项目进行操作的心理任务会在几百毫秒内完成。在这类任务中,项目是同时(并行)处理还是按顺序(串行)处理,长期以来一直是心理学家感兴趣的问题。尽管某些类型的并行和串行模型已被排除,但事实证明,要根据典型数据完全区分合理的串行模型和有限容量的并行模型极其困难。理论驱动方法学的最新进展现在允许对这类任务中的串行与并行处理进行有力测试,其方式绕过了容量问题,且与分布和参数无关。我们采用新方法来评估串行与并行处理,并发现了纯串行或纯并行处理的有力证据,不同个体和刺激间条件存在一些显著的明显差异。