Boisserie Jean-Renaud, Lihoreau Fabrice, Brunet Michel
Human Evolution Research Center, Department of Integrative Biology/Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building no. 3140, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 1;102(5):1537-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409518102. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
The origin of late Neogene Hippopotamidae (Artiodactyla) involves one of the most serious conflicts between comparative anatomy and molecular biology: is Artiodactyla paraphyletic? Molecular comparisons indicate that Cetacea should be the modern sister group of hippos. This finding implies the existence of a fossil lineage linking cetaceans (first known in the early Eocene) to hippos (first known in the middle Miocene). The relationships of hippos within Artiodactyla are challenging, and the immediate affinities of Hippopotamidae have been studied by biologists for almost two centuries without resolution. Here, we compare opposing hypotheses implicating several "suiform" families. This morphological analysis of a comprehensive set of taxa and characters offers a robust solution to the origins of Hippopotamidae. This family appears to be deeply nested within the otherwise extinct artiodactyl family Anthracotheriidae, most precisely within the most advanced selenodont forms. The proposed sister group of hippos is the middle to late Miocene African semiaquatic Libycosaurus. Any close relationships of hippos with suoids, particularly with Tayassuidae, are rejected. Furthermore, the clade (Hippopotamidae, Anthracotheriidae) is proposed as the sister group of the Cetacea, offering broad morphological support for a molecular phylogeny, such support being also consistent with the fossil record. Corroboration of this relationship requires an exploration of anthracothere affinities with other Paleogene artiodactyls. Among those, the position of Ruminantia is a central question, still to be solved. Further progress in this debate is likely to come from morphological studies of paleontological data, whether known or still to be discovered.
晚新近纪河马科(偶蹄目)的起源涉及比较解剖学与分子生物学之间最严重的冲突之一:偶蹄目是并系群吗?分子比较表明,鲸目应该是河马的现代姐妹类群。这一发现意味着存在一个化石谱系,将鲸类(最早出现在始新世早期)与河马(最早出现在中新世中期)联系起来。河马在偶蹄目中的关系具有挑战性,生物学家们研究河马科的直接亲缘关系近两个世纪仍未解决。在这里,我们比较了涉及几个“猪形”科的相反假说。对一组全面的分类单元和特征进行的形态学分析为河马科的起源提供了一个可靠的解决方案。这个科似乎深深地嵌套在已经灭绝的偶蹄目炭兽科中,最确切地说是在最先进的月型齿形式中。提议的河马姐妹类群是中新世中期到晚期的非洲半水生动物利比亚兽。河马与猪形动物,特别是与西猯科的任何密切关系都被否定。此外,(河马科,炭兽科)这一支系被提议作为鲸目的姐妹类群,为分子系统发育提供了广泛的形态学支持,这种支持也与化石记录一致。对这种关系的证实需要探索炭兽与其他古近纪偶蹄动物的亲缘关系。其中,反刍亚目的位置是一个核心问题,仍有待解决。这场争论的进一步进展可能来自对古生物学数据的形态学研究,无论这些数据是已知的还是有待发现的。