Xu Yaoda
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1234-42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi006. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
It has previously been reported (Gauthier et al., 2000, Nat. Neurosci., 3:191-197) in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study that objects of visual expertise (cars and birds) activate the right fusiform face area (FFA) more strongly than non-expertise stimuli, and it was argued that the right FFA is involved in expertise specific rather than face specific visual processing. This expertise effect, however, may be due to experts taking advantage of the 'faceness' of the stimuli: birds have faces and three-quarter frontal views of cars resemble faces. This expertise effect may also be caused by a biased attentional modulation: with a blocked fMRI design, experts may attend more to a block of expertise than a block of non-expertise stimuli. In this study, using both side-view car images that do not resemble faces and bird images in an event-related fMRI design that minimizes attentional modulation, an expertise effect in the right FFA is observed in both car and bird experts (although a baseline bias makes the bird expertise effect less reliable). These results are consistent with those of Gauthier et al., and suggest the involvement of the right FFA in processing non-face expertise visual stimuli.
先前有研究报道(Gauthier等人,2000年,《自然神经科学》,3:191 - 197),在一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,视觉专家所熟悉的物体(汽车和鸟类)比非专业刺激更强烈地激活右侧梭状回面孔区(FFA),并且有人认为右侧FFA参与的是特定专业领域而非特定面孔的视觉处理。然而,这种专业知识效应可能是由于专家利用了刺激物的“面部特征”:鸟类有面孔,汽车的四分之三前视图类似面孔。这种专业知识效应也可能是由有偏差的注意力调节引起的:在fMRI的组块设计中,专家可能会更多地关注专业组块而非非专业刺激组块。在本研究中,使用不类似面孔的汽车侧视图图像和鸟类图像,采用事件相关fMRI设计以最小化注意力调节,在汽车和鸟类专家中均观察到右侧FFA出现专业知识效应(尽管基线偏差使得鸟类专业知识效应不太可靠)。这些结果与Gauthier等人的结果一致,并表明右侧FFA参与处理非面孔专业知识的视觉刺激。