• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对动机相关面孔进行最低限度暴露后梭状回面孔区的调制:内群体增强(而非外群体忽视)的证据。

Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard).

机构信息

New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3343-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00016. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00016
PMID:21452952
Abstract

Studies have shown that fusiform face area (FFA) activity increases with visual expertise. We present an fMRI study showing that faces from a social category made relevant by an experimental manipulation (members of an experimentally created in-group) preferentially recruited the FFA even when they were matched in exposure to face stimuli from a less significant social category (members of an experimentally created out-group). Faces were randomly assigned to groups and fully counterbalanced so that no perceptual cues allowed participants to visually distinguish category membership. The results revealed a pattern of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard), such that the FFA was selectively engaged following the presentation of in-group compared with out-group or unaffiliated control faces even when the intergroup distinction was arbitrary, and exposure to in-group and out-group faces was equivalent and brief. In addition, individual differences in FFA activity for in-group versus out-group faces were correlated with recognition memory differences for in-group and out-group faces. The effects of group membership on the FFA were not affected by task instruction to respond to in-group or out-group members and were functionally dissociated from early visual processing in the primary visual cortex. This study provides evidence that the FFA is sensitive to top-down influences and may be involved in subordinate level (vs. superordinate level) encoding of stimuli in the absence of long-term exposure or explicit task instructions.

摘要

研究表明梭状回面孔区(FFA)的活动随视觉专长而增强。我们进行了一项 fMRI 研究,结果显示,通过实验操作使某些面孔(实验创建的内群体成员)与社会类别相关联,即使这些面孔与来自不太重要的社会类别的面孔(实验创建的外群体成员)在暴露于面孔刺激方面相匹配,FFA 也会优先招募。面孔被随机分配到组中,并完全平衡,因此没有知觉线索允许参与者从视觉上区分类别成员。结果显示出内群体增强的模式(而不是外群体忽视),即与呈现外群体或非关联对照组面孔相比,内群体面孔呈现后 FFA 会选择性地参与,即使群体间的区别是任意的,并且内群体和外群体面孔的暴露是等效且短暂的。此外,FFA 对内群体与外群体面孔的活动个体差异与对内群体和外群体面孔的识别记忆差异相关。群体成员对内群体和外群体面孔的 FFA 的影响不受针对内群体或外群体成员做出反应的任务指令的影响,并且与初级视觉皮层中的早期视觉处理在功能上分离。这项研究提供了证据表明 FFA 对外来的自上而下的影响敏感,并且可能参与了没有长期暴露或明确任务指令的刺激的从属级别(而不是高级别)编码。

相似文献

1
Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard).对动机相关面孔进行最低限度暴露后梭状回面孔区的调制:内群体增强(而非外群体忽视)的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3343-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00016. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
2
The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.梭状回面孔区的不对称性是一种稳定的个体特征,它是面孔左视野优势的基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Nov;46(13):3061-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.017. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
3
Functional specialization and convergence in the occipito-temporal cortex supporting haptic and visual identification of human faces and body parts: an fMRI study.枕颞叶皮层在支持通过触觉和视觉识别人类面部及身体部位方面的功能特化与趋同:一项功能磁共振成像研究
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Oct;21(10):2027-45. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21115.
4
Category-specific organization of prefrontal response-facilitation during priming.启动过程中前额叶反应促进的类别特异性组织
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(10):1765-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 15.
5
The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.自闭症患者大脑对个人熟悉面孔的反应:梭状回活动及其他方面的研究结果
Brain. 2004 Dec;127(Pt 12):2703-16. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh289. Epub 2004 Aug 19.
6
fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces.面孔神经表征的功能磁共振成像证据。
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1386-90. doi: 10.1038/nn1538. Epub 2005 Sep 4.
7
The involvement of the "fusiform face area" in processing facial expression.“梭状回面孔区”在加工面部表情中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(11):1645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.012. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
8
Portraits or people? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex.肖像还是人物?人类视觉皮层中面部身份的不同表征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jul;17(7):1043-57. doi: 10.1162/0898929054475181.
9
Encoding deficit during face processing within the right fusiform face area in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者右侧梭状回面孔区在面孔加工过程中的编码缺陷。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Jun 30;172(3):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.07.009. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
10
Memory for friends or foes: the social context of past encounters with faces modulates their subsequent neural traces in the brain.对朋友或敌人的记忆:过去与面孔相遇的社会背景会调节其随后在大脑中的神经痕迹。
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(5):384-401. doi: 10.1080/17470910902941793. Epub 2009 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Impact of Parental Practices and Parental Emotional Clarity on Child Symptoms in Single-Child vs. Multiple-Child Divorced Families.独生子女与多子女离异家庭中父母教养方式及父母情绪清晰度对儿童症状的差异影响
Children (Basel). 2024 Dec 3;11(12):1481. doi: 10.3390/children11121481.
2
Encoding of Race Categories by Single Neurons in the Human Brain.人类大脑中单个神经元对种族类别的编码。
NeuroSci. 2022 Aug 5;3(3):419-439. doi: 10.3390/neurosci3030031. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Priors and prejudice: hierarchical predictive processing in intergroup perception.
先验与偏见:群体间感知中的分层预测处理
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1386370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386370. eCollection 2024.
4
Associations between childhood ethnoracial minority density, cortical thickness, and social engagement among minority youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.童年时期少数族裔聚居密度与皮质厚度,以及少数族裔青年临床精神病高危人群中的社会参与度之间的关联。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Nov;48(12):1707-1715. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01649-6. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
5
Exposure to Multicultural Context Affects Neural Response to Out-Group Faces: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.接触多元文化环境会影响对外群体面孔的神经反应:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 16;23(8):4030. doi: 10.3390/s23084030.
6
Inter-Group Face Recognition Bias Was Modulated by the Group Status.群体间的人脸识别偏差受群体地位的调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:837836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837836. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of perceived interpersonal similarity on attention to the eyes of same-race and other-race faces.感知人际相似性对视同种族和异种族面孔眼睛注视的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Nov 2;6(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00336-8.
8
The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence.群体间威胁与暴力的神经科学
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Effects of Minimal Grouping On Implicit Prejudice, Infrahumanization, and Neural Processing Despite Orthogonal Social Categorizations.尽管存在正交社会分类,最小分组对内隐偏见、超人性化和神经加工的影响。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2020 Apr 1;23(3):323-343. doi: 10.1177/1368430219837348. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Processing of Task-Irrelevant Race Information is Associated with Diminished Cognitive Control in Black and White Individuals.任务无关种族信息的处理与黑人和白人个体认知控制能力下降有关。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):625-638. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00896-8. Epub 2021 May 3.