Crestanello Juan A, Deschamps Claude, Cassivi Stephen D, Nichols Francis C, Allen Mark S, Schleck Cathy, Pairolero Peter C
Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Feb;129(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.024.
We sought to analyze our experience with management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.
All patients who had intrathoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy were reviewed. Management and factors affecting outcome were analyzed.
From March 1993 through February 2003, 761 patients had esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis at our institution. Forty-eight (6.3%) patients had an anastomotic leak; one refused authorization to review his medical record and was excluded from further analysis. Twenty-four (51.1%) patients had a contained leak. Twenty-seven (57.4%) patients were managed nonoperatively. Twenty (42.6%) patients required surgical intervention that included primary anastomotic repair in 14 patients, reinforcement of the anastomosis with viable tissue in 6 patients, and esophageal diversion in 2 patients. A single reoperation was done in 15 patients, and 5 patients had 2 reoperations. Median hospitalization in the reoperative group was 31 days (range, 15-97 days) and 20 days (range, 10-42 days) in the nonoperative group ( P = .0037). Four (8.5%) patients died. Cause of death was sepsis in 2 patients and multiorgan failure and myocardial infarction in 1 patient each. At follow-up (median, 8 months; range, 1-120 months), 10 (58.8%) patients in the reoperative group were eating a normal diet and 5 (29.4%) patients required at least one dilatation compared with 20 (76.9%) patients in the nonoperative group who were eating a normal diet and 9 (34.6%) who required at least one dilatation. A noncontained leak had an adverse effect on long-term survival ( P = .04).
Intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Contained leaks often can be managed nonoperatively. When surgical management is required, esophagogastric continuity can often be maintained in the majority of patients. Long-term functional results are satisfactory and similar in both the reoperative and nonoperative groups. However, a noncontained leak adversely affected long-term survival.
我们试图分析我们在食管切除术后胸内吻合口漏管理方面的经验。
回顾了所有食管切除术后发生胸内吻合口漏的患者。分析了管理方法及影响预后的因素。
1993年3月至2003年2月,我院761例患者行食管切除并胸内吻合术。48例(6.3%)患者发生吻合口漏;1例拒绝授权查阅其病历,被排除在进一步分析之外。24例(51.1%)患者为局限性漏。27例(57.4%)患者采取非手术治疗。20例(42.6%)患者需要手术干预,其中14例行一期吻合口修复,6例行带蒂组织加固吻合口,2例行食管转流术。15例患者进行了1次再次手术,5例患者进行了2次再次手术。再次手术组的中位住院时间为31天(范围15 - 97天),非手术组为20天(范围10 - 42天)(P = 0.0037)。4例(8.5%)患者死亡。2例死于脓毒症,1例死于多器官功能衰竭,1例死于心肌梗死。随访(中位时间8个月;范围1 - 120个月)时,再次手术组10例(58.8%)患者正常饮食,5例(29.4%)患者至少需要1次扩张;相比之下,非手术组20例(76.9%)患者正常饮食,9例(34.6%)患者至少需要1次扩张。非局限性漏对长期生存有不利影响(P = 0.04)。
食管切除术后胸内吻合口漏与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。局限性漏通常可采取非手术治疗。当需要手术治疗时,大多数患者通常可维持食管胃连续性。再次手术组和非手术组的长期功能结果均令人满意且相似。然而,非局限性漏对长期生存有不利影响。