Fernando Hiran C, Santos Ricardo S, Benfield John R, Grannis Frederic W, Keenan Robert J, Luketich James D, Close John M, Landreneau Rodney J
Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Feb;129(2):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.025.
Computed tomographic screening is detecting ever smaller peripheral non-small cell lung cancers. These smaller cancers are amenable to sublobar resection, but sublobar resection is not currently the treatment of choice. This study compared sublobar resection with lobar resection for stage IA non-small cell lung cancers to assess whether sublobar resection is appropriate treatment for certain lesions. The use of adjuvant brachytherapy was also evaluated.
A retrospective multicenter study of 291 patients with T1 N0 disease was done. Outcomes after sublobar resection (n = 124) were compared with those after lobar resection (n = 167). Brachytherapy was used in conjunction with 60 (48%) sublobar resection operations. Analysis based on tumor diameter was performed.
There were 137 cancers smaller than 2 cm and 154 cancers ranging from 2 to 3 cm. Patients undergoing sublobar resection were older (68.4 vs 66.1 years, P = .018) with poorer pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 53.1% vs 78.2%, P = .001). Mean follow-up was 34.5 months. Brachytherapy decreased local recurrence rate significantly among patients undergoing sublobar resection, from 11 (17.2%) to 2 (3.3%). For tumors smaller than 2 cm, there was no difference in survival between sublobar resection and lobar resection groups. For the larger tumors (2-3 cm), median survival was significantly better in the lobar resection group, at 70 versus 44.7 months ( P = .003).
Intraoperative brachytherapy may reduce the local recurrence that is usually reported with sublobar resection. Our experience supports the further investigation of the use of sublobar resection with brachytherapy for peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancers smaller than 2 cm.
计算机断层扫描筛查正发现越来越小的外周型非小细胞肺癌。这些较小的癌症适合进行肺叶以下切除,但目前肺叶以下切除并非首选治疗方法。本研究比较了肺叶以下切除与肺叶切除治疗ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌的效果,以评估肺叶以下切除是否适合某些病变。同时还评估了辅助近距离放射治疗的应用。
对291例T1 N0疾病患者进行了一项回顾性多中心研究。比较了肺叶以下切除组(n = 124)和肺叶切除组(n = 167)的结局。60例(48%)肺叶以下切除手术联合使用了近距离放射治疗。进行了基于肿瘤直径的分析。
有137例癌症小于2 cm,154例癌症在2至3 cm之间。接受肺叶以下切除的患者年龄较大(68.4岁对66.1岁,P = 0.018),肺功能较差(1秒用力呼气量为53.1%对78.2%,P = 0.001)。平均随访时间为34.5个月。近距离放射治疗显著降低了肺叶以下切除患者的局部复发率,从11例(17.2%)降至2例(3.3%)。对于小于2 cm的肿瘤,肺叶以下切除组和肺叶切除组的生存率无差异。对于较大的肿瘤(2 - 3 cm),肺叶切除组的中位生存期明显更好,为70个月对44.7个月(P = 0.003)。
术中近距离放射治疗可能会降低通常与肺叶以下切除相关的局部复发率。我们的经验支持进一步研究对小于2 cm的外周ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌使用肺叶以下切除联合近距离放射治疗。