Zhao Binsheng, Schwartz Lawrence H, Moskowitz Chaya S, Wang Liang, Ginsberg Michelle S, Cooper Cathleen A, Jiang Li, Kalaigian John P
Department of Radiology and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):934-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343040020. Epub 2005 Jan 28.
To assess the effect of commonly used computed tomographic (CT) section thicknesses on metastatic tumor measurements calculated with unidimensional, bidimensional, area, and volumetric methods.
Analysis and data collection were approved by the Institutional Review Board, with waived informed patient consent. Forty-two pulmonary metastases in 10 patients (three men and seven women; age range, 43-83 years; mean age, 65.4 years) were analyzed on CT scans obtained with 3.75-, 5.0-, and 7.5-mm section thicknesses. The lesions were automatically delineated by using a three-dimensional multicriteria segmentation algorithm. Unidimensional (the largest diameter), bidimensional (the product of the two maximal perpendicular diameters), maximal cross-sectional area, and volumetric measurements were automatically obtained for each pulmonary lesion on each section thickness. Means and variances were calculated, and the differences across the three section thicknesses for each of the four measurements were studied by using linear mixed-effects models. The Levene test was used to study the equality of variances.
Differences in the means for unidimensional, bidimensional, and area measurements were significant between a section thickness of 3.75 and 5.0 mm (unidimensional, P=.05; bidimensional, P=.05; area, P=.01) and 3.75 and 7.5 mm (unidimensional, P=.06; bidimensional, P=.03; area, P=.02), but not 5.0 and 7.5 mm. There was a significant difference in volumetric measurement as section thickness decreased from 7.5 to 5.0 mm (P <.001) and from 7.5 to 3.75 mm (P <.001). Although there was a slight trend for differences in the variances across section thickness for each measurement, none of the differences were significant.
Volumetric tumor measurements change with a reduction in section thickness from 7.5 to 5.0 and 3.75 mm. For unidimensional measurement, no change was found when thickness decreased from 7.5 to 5.0 mm.
评估常用计算机断层扫描(CT)层厚对采用一维、二维、面积和容积法计算的转移性肿瘤测量值的影响。
分析和数据收集获机构审查委员会批准,患者知情同意书豁免。对10例患者(3例男性,7例女性;年龄范围43 - 83岁;平均年龄65.4岁)的42个肺转移瘤进行分析,CT扫描层厚分别为3.75、5.0和7.5毫米。使用三维多标准分割算法自动勾勒病变。对每个肺转移瘤在每个层厚上自动获取一维(最大直径)、二维(两个最大垂直直径的乘积)、最大横截面积和容积测量值。计算均值和方差,并使用线性混合效应模型研究四种测量中每种在三个层厚之间的差异。使用Levene检验研究方差齐性。
在3.75毫米和5.0毫米层厚之间,一维、二维和面积测量均值差异显著(一维,P = 0.05;二维,P = 0.05;面积,P = 0.01),3.75毫米和7.5毫米层厚之间也显著(一维,P = 0.06;二维,P = 0.03;面积,P = 0.02),但5.0毫米和7.5毫米层厚之间不显著。当层厚从7.5毫米降至5.0毫米(P < 0.001)以及从7.5毫米降至3.75毫米(P < 0.001)时,容积测量有显著差异。尽管每种测量在不同层厚之间的方差差异有轻微趋势,但均无显著差异。
肿瘤容积测量值随层厚从7.5毫米降至5.0毫米和3.75毫米而变化。对于一维测量,当层厚从7.5毫米降至5.0毫米时未发现变化。