Burri Haran, Sunthorn Henri, Dorsaz Pierre-André, Shah Dipen
Cardiology Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S280-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00039.x.
Axillary vein puncture may be used to implant pacemaker (PM) or cardioverter defibrillator leads, though usually requires venography. We prospectively compared punctures guided by venography versus a new radiological landmark. In 232 patients, the puncture was guided by injecting diluted contrast material via an ipsilateral peripheral vein (group A, n = 142), or without venography using the intersection of the lateral borders of the second and third rib as a radiological landmark, followed by contrast injection in case of failure (group B, n = 90). We implantated 1-3 leads per patient. In group A, implantation was successful in 135 patients (95%) and in group B in 55 patients (61%, P < 0.001 vs group A). Subsequent contrast injection allowed successful implantations in 34 of 35 patients, with an success rate of 97% for the overall study population of 224 patients. Venous access was achieved after a mean of 10.4 +/- 3.2 minutes of skin incision in group A versus 9.4 +/- 3.0 minutes in group B (ns). Pneumothorax occurred in two patients (1% overall). Thus non-contrast guided puncture using a new radiological landmark was successful in a majority of patients. This technique may be useful in absence of ipsilateral peripheral vein access, or presence of contrast allergy.
腋窝静脉穿刺可用于植入起搏器(PM)或心脏复律除颤器导线,不过通常需要静脉造影。我们前瞻性地比较了静脉造影引导下的穿刺与一种新的放射学标志引导下的穿刺。在232例患者中,穿刺通过经同侧外周静脉注射稀释的造影剂来引导(A组,n = 142),或者在无静脉造影的情况下,以第二和第三肋骨外侧缘的交点作为放射学标志进行穿刺,失败时再注射造影剂(B组,n = 90)。我们为每位患者植入1 - 3根导线。A组中,135例患者(95%)植入成功,B组中55例患者(61%,与A组相比P < 0.001)植入成功。随后的造影剂注射使35例患者中的34例成功植入,在224例患者的总体研究人群中成功率为97%。A组平均在皮肤切开10.4 +/- 3.2分钟后获得静脉通路,B组为9.4 +/- 3.0分钟(无显著差异)。两名患者(总体1%)发生气胸。因此,使用新的放射学标志进行非造影引导穿刺在大多数患者中是成功的。该技术在同侧外周静脉无法穿刺或存在造影剂过敏的情况下可能有用。