• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏器腋静脉穿刺的标准化操作程序。

Standardised procedure for pacemaker axillary vein puncture.

作者信息

Ji Bing, Mao Yu, Liu Xue-Bo, Sun Bing, Xie Yuan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04731-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-025-04731-7
PMID:40234741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12001439/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The axillary vein approach has emerged as a promising alternative to subclavian venous access for pacemaker implantation, offering potential advantages including reduced infection risk and enhanced procedural success. However, standardized protocols for fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein puncture remain undefined.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the feasibility of a simplified fluoroscopic technique for axillary vein puncture and (2) establish anatomical and clinical predictors of procedural success.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 178 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation at Shanghai Tongji Hospital (January 2022-December 2023) were stratified by puncture technique: right anterior oblique (RAO) 30°, Caudal 35° (C-arm angled toward feet), and vein-guided fluoroscopy. Demographics (age, sex), comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), spinal disorders), smoking status, and radiographic parameters (subclavian fat thickness, clavicle-first rib angle) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Axillary vein puncture was successful in 169/178 patients (94.9%) without venography. First-attempt success rates were 75.8% (135/178) for RAO 30° and 79.1% (34/43) for Caudal 35°. Key predictors of success included: Sex-specific anatomy, BMI threshold and Clavicular angx les. There was a significant difference in smoking status, subclavian fat thickness 2 cm below the collarbone between males and females (P < 0.001).ROC analysis identified BMI ≥ 23.84 kg/m² as optimal for success (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.83).Frontal clavicle-first rib angle independently predicted RAO 30° success (P = 0.012, OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15), while RAO clavicle-first rib angle correlated with Caudal 35° success (P = 0.031, OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09). In this study, the cumulative incidence of procedure-related complications was 1.69%. Severe complications such as pneumothorax or lead dislodgement were not observed, highlighting the safety profile of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein puncture depends critically on patient-specific anatomical factors, including sex, BMI, clavicle-first rib spatial relationships, and smoking status. Our standardized protocol achieved high success rates (94.9%) without ultrasound assistance, highlighting its utility in resource-limited settings.

摘要

背景

腋静脉穿刺法已成为起搏器植入术中锁骨下静脉穿刺的一种有前景的替代方法,具有降低感染风险和提高手术成功率等潜在优势。然而,透视引导下腋静脉穿刺的标准化方案仍未明确。

目的

本研究旨在(1)评估一种简化的透视技术用于腋静脉穿刺的可行性,以及(2)确定手术成功的解剖学和临床预测因素。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,对上海同济大学附属同济医院(2022年1月至2023年12月)连续178例行起搏器植入术的患者,根据穿刺技术进行分层:右前斜位(RAO)30°、尾位35°(C形臂向足部倾斜)和静脉引导透视。分析了人口统计学特征(年龄、性别)、合并症(慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、脊柱疾病)、吸烟状况和影像学参数(锁骨下脂肪厚度、锁骨-第一肋骨夹角)。

结果

169/178例患者(94.9%)腋静脉穿刺成功,无需静脉造影。RAO 30°的首次穿刺成功率为75.8%(135/178),尾位35°的首次穿刺成功率为79.1%(34/43)。成功的关键预测因素包括:性别特异性解剖结构、BMI阈值和锁骨夹角。男性和女性在吸烟状况、锁骨下方2厘米处的锁骨下脂肪厚度方面存在显著差异(P<0.001)。ROC分析确定BMI≥23.84kg/m²是成功的最佳指标(AUC=0.64,95%CI:0.48-0.83)。额位锁骨-第一肋骨夹角独立预测RAO 30°穿刺成功(P=0.012,OR=1.08,95%CI:1.02-1.15),而RAO锁骨-第一肋骨夹角与尾位35°穿刺成功相关(P=0.031,OR=1.05,95%CI:1.01-1.09)。在本研究中,手术相关并发症的累积发生率为1.69%。未观察到气胸或导线移位等严重并发症,突出了该干预措施的安全性。

结论

透视引导下腋静脉穿刺成功与否关键取决于患者特定的解剖因素,包括性别、BMI、锁骨-第一肋骨空间关系和吸烟状况。我们的标准化方案在无超声辅助的情况下取得了较高的成功率(94.9%),突出了其在资源有限环境中的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/e69012eebeef/12872_2025_4731_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/1a36767d3ae5/12872_2025_4731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/570f922c9acb/12872_2025_4731_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/17bd7cde7ca8/12872_2025_4731_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/e69012eebeef/12872_2025_4731_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/1a36767d3ae5/12872_2025_4731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/570f922c9acb/12872_2025_4731_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/17bd7cde7ca8/12872_2025_4731_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e41/12001439/e69012eebeef/12872_2025_4731_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Standardised procedure for pacemaker axillary vein puncture.起搏器腋静脉穿刺的标准化操作程序。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04731-7.
2
Self-taught axillary vein access without venography for pacemaker implantation: prospective randomized comparison with the cephalic vein access.自学腋窝静脉入路无静脉造影在起搏器植入术中的应用:与头静脉入路的前瞻性随机比较。
Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):2001-2006. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw363.
3
Axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks: a safe and effective approach for implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.使用透视标志进行腋静脉穿刺:植入式心脏复律除颤器导线置入的一种安全有效的方法。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Sep;43(3):263-7. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0011-7. Epub 2015 May 9.
4
Fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.荧光透视引导下腋静脉入路与头静脉入路在起搏器和除颤器植入中的比较:有效性和安全性的随机临床试验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1588-1593. doi: 10.1111/jce.14060. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.静脉通路和长期起搏器导线故障:对比腋静脉穿刺与锁骨下穿刺和头静脉切开。
Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1193-1197. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw147.
6
Contrast venography vs. microwire assisted axillary venipuncture for cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation.对比对比静脉造影术与微丝辅助腋静脉穿刺在心血管植入式电子设备植入术中的应用。
Europace. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):1318-1323. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux215.
7
Axillary vein puncture without contrast venography for pacemaker and defibrillator leads implantation.无需造影剂静脉造影的腋静脉穿刺用于起搏器和除颤器导线植入
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Sep;36(9):1107-10. doi: 10.1111/pace.12181. Epub 2013 May 28.
8
Axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound vs cephalic vein dissection in pacemaker and defibrillator implant: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.超声引导下腋静脉穿刺与头静脉切开在起搏器和除颤器植入中的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1554-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Venous Axillary Access Versus Standard Fluoroscopic Technique for Cardiac Lead Implantation: ZEROFLUOROAXI Randomized Trial.超声引导下腋静脉入路与常规透视技术在心脏导线植入中的比较:ZEROFLUOROAXI 随机试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;10(3):554-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.11.020. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
10
Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Vein Puncture Versus Landmark-Guided Approach for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Placement.超声引导下腋静脉穿刺与体表标志引导法用于心脏植入式电子设备植入的比较
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;48(1):9-20. doi: 10.1111/pace.15107. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantation technique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).EHRA 专家共识声明及关于传统起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器最佳植入技术的实用指南:得到了心脏节律学会(HRS)、亚太心脏节律学会(APHRS)和拉丁美洲心脏节律学会(LAHRS)的认可。
Europace. 2021 Jul 18;23(7):983-1008. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa367.
2
Utility of Caudal Angulation for Venous Access under Fluoroscopic Guidance during Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.经荧光透视引导下心血管植入式电子设备植入术中尾侧成角对静脉入路的作用。
Cardiology. 2021;146(4):464-468. doi: 10.1159/000515360. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Axillary vein access for antiarrhythmic cardiac device implantation: a literature review.经腋静脉进行抗心律失常心脏装置植入:文献综述。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Apr 1;22(4):237-245. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001044.
4
Body mass index is related to unsuccessful puncture attempts and failure to axillary vein cannulation during ultrasound-guided cardiac electronic device implantation.在超声引导下心脏电子设备植入过程中,体重指数与穿刺尝试失败及腋静脉插管失败相关。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00800-3. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Predictors of successful ultrasound-guided lead implantation.超声引导下导丝植入成功的预测因素。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):217-222. doi: 10.1111/pace.13855. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
6
[Feasibility and safety of new "blind" axillary vein puncture technique in pacemaker implantation].新型“盲穿”腋静脉穿刺技术在起搏器植入中的可行性与安全性
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 24;47(9):737-741. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.09.016.
7
Ultrasound-guided axillary venous access for pediatric and adult congenital lead implantation.超声引导下小儿及成人先天性起搏器植入的腋静脉穿刺置管术
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):166-170. doi: 10.1111/pace.13567. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
On Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis.关于医学图像分析的深度学习
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1192-1193. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13316.
9
Cephalic vs. subclavian lead implantation in cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头静脉与锁骨下静脉途径植入心脏植入式电子设备的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):121-129. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy165.
10
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary/subclavian venous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation: a randomized study.超声引导下腋静脉/锁骨下静脉途径用于起搏器和除颤器导线植入的疗效:一项随机研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;51(2):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0313-7. Epub 2018 Jan 15.