Holtzman Joseph M, Elliot Norbert, Biber Cheryl L, Sanders R Michael
Department of Community Health, UMDNJ-NJDS, 110 Bergen Street, Room B-848, Newark, New Jersey 07101-1709, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2005 Feb;69(2):285-95.
This study tested the feasibility of using computer-based tools for the assessment of written materials produced by dental students. Written assignments produced by three consecutive incoming dental school classes (240 students) were assessed, and the performance among and between classes was analyzed. Computerized assessment of documents produced by students in the context of their regular coursework proved to be an efficient and effective mechanism for assessing performance. Student performance, assessed as a byproduct of this research, was disappointing. The performance of all classes fell below the eleventh grade level, with some students producing written material at a level of sophistication generally expected from middle school children. Existing technology shows promise as a vehicle for enhancing the assessment of dental students' written communication skills. The ease of use and minimal training necessary to apply this technology can help mitigate the time-intensive nature of writing assessment. If this assessment information is then used to enhance instruction--a process inherently available through software such as WebCT--the distance between assessment and instruction may be more readily bridged through an increase in the use of technology.
本研究测试了使用计算机工具评估牙科学生书面材料的可行性。对连续三个入学牙科班级(240名学生)的书面作业进行了评估,并分析了班级之间和班级内部的表现。在学生常规课程作业背景下对其文档进行计算机化评估,被证明是评估表现的一种高效且有效的机制。作为本研究的副产品进行评估的学生表现令人失望。所有班级的表现都低于十一年级水平,一些学生撰写的书面材料的复杂程度通常只相当于中学生。现有技术有望成为提高牙科学生书面沟通技能评估的一种手段。应用该技术的易用性和所需的最少培训,有助于缓解写作评估耗时的问题。如果然后将此评估信息用于加强教学——通过诸如WebCT之类的软件本身就可实现这一过程——那么通过增加技术使用,评估与教学之间的差距可能更容易弥合。